the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / How many big prints?

How many big prints?

November 11, 2019 JimK 2 Comments

I recently got into a discussion with a photographer who was saying that most people don’t make big prints anymore. Since I had just spent the day running an entire 50-foot roll of Legacy Baryta through my Epson 9800 making 24x30s for an upcoming exhibition — more on that in good time — I didn’t immediately agree.

I got to wondering how many big prints I’d made in the last 10 or so years that I’ve had the 9800. It occured to me that all I had to do was look at a nozzle check:

35437 cm is about 1160 feet of paper. I normally print on 36-inch rolls, with 2-inch margins, which allows me to print 32 inches wide. I print on 44-inch paper when I need to go bigger, and the is the first time I’ve used 24-inch paper. I used to print on 24×30 flat sheets, which I arranged in the printer with the short direction up and down. I have a P800 for prints C-size of smaller, and it is the latest in a long line of 17-inch printers, so I’ve never made small prints on the 9800.

If I put all of that together and apply Kentucky windage, my guess is that I’ve made about 400 big prints.  Since the printer cost me about $5K, that means that I’ve spent about $12.50 a print for the hardware. Less if you include the fact that the printer came with about $600 worth of ink.

The Last Word

← Fundamental camera noise parameters Nikon Z50 EDR and read noise spectra →

Comments

  1. Hans van Driest says

    November 16, 2019 at 4:07 am

    Can I ask, since you own both a 9800 and a p800, if you see much difference in print quality? Resolution/color anything? I own a 7800 and am happy with it, but sometimes wonder if a newer printer would visually improve my prints.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 16, 2019 at 6:07 am

      The P800 is a little sharper. My old 4900 had a wider gamut. But, for big prints, the 9800 is great. And it almost never clogs! If you get the P800, keep the 7800 until it breaks. I’ve heard parts are hard to come by.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

January 2023
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Brian Olson on Fuji GFX 100S exposure strategy, M and A modes
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on Picking a macro lens
  • Glenn Whorrall on Picking a macro lens
  • JimK on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • Hatzipavlis Peter on What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?
  • JeyB on Internal focusing 100ish macro lenses
  • JimK on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Garry George on How focus-bracketing systems work
  • Rhonald on Format size and image quality

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.