• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Z9 / Nikon Z9 finder latency at 20 fps

Nikon Z9 finder latency at 20 fps

January 29, 2022 JimK 4 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z9. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Z9”.

In the previous post, I looked at the static latency of the LCD screen on the Z9, both with the shutter half pressed and not.  In this post, I will examine the latency in continuous shooting at 20 fps. I set the shutter speed to 1/2500 to give the camera an opportunity to shine here.

Here’s the setup.

The camera is aimed at an oscilloscope with a 10 KHz full scale input wave, and the time base set to 5 msec/division. I photographed the LCD and the scope with a Sony a9 in portrait orientation (to prevent the Sony focal plane scan time from becoming an issue), with the mechanical shutter set to 1/500 second.

Here’s a crop of the above image:

 

Here’s just the scope shot directly:

 

And here’s the LCD on the Z9 from that same shot:

The distance from the right edge of the scope trace to the right edge of the LCD display is 4.5 divisions, or 22.5 milliseconds. The distance from the left edge of the scope trace to the left edge of the LCD display is 5.8 divisions a bit under 30 milliseconds. Call the average about 26 milliseconds. This is at least as fast as the static display, and like nothing I’ve ever seen in a MILC. Congratulations, Nikon!

Z9

← Nikon Z9 static finder latency Visual effects of Nikon Z9 conversion gain switching, no NR →

Comments

  1. CarVac says

    January 30, 2022 at 6:45 am

    How does the A9 compare?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 30, 2022 at 6:51 am

      The A9 display is one frame behind. But I should probably test that.

      Reply
  2. Alan says

    January 31, 2022 at 3:31 pm

    Some users have pointed out that when you zoom in (for verifying focus) that the EVF will introduce noticeable lag that isn’t seen in the zoomed out view. Can you run the same time under a magnified view?

    I can send you the Youtube link of the reviewer that saw that issue if you cannot reproduce the display lag.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 31, 2022 at 3:57 pm

      That was the way the Z7 worked. I’ll check it out. Thanks.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.