• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / a7R vs D810 resolution — moderate shutter speeds

a7R vs D810 resolution — moderate shutter speeds

May 31, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

We saw in the preceding post that, once we deep-sixed Lightroom’s capricious sharpening, the a7R and the D810 offered similar resolution (as measured by MTF50) in one direction and that the D810 did somewhat better in the other, when the target was illuminated with electronic flash, and we used trailing curtain synch on the a7R and EFCS on the D810.

What about with a continuous light source? I performed the following tests:

I set up a D810 in landscape orientation using a RRS L-bracket on an Arca Swiss C1 cube head attached to a set of RRS TVC-43 legs. I mounted a Zeiss 55mm f/1.4 Otus.

  • The lighting: a single Fotodiox 5500 degree Kelvin variable output LED flood. The room was darkened otherwise, except for focusing.
  • ISO set to 100, f-stop set to f/4.
  • Focusing manually at f/1.4, using the magnifier. The focus point is a Siemens star on an Imatest slanted-edge target.
  • Shutter delay set to 3 seconds
  • EFCS on, dial to Mup
  • Fotodiox flood to full, shutter to 1/500 second, make 16 exposures, turn the flood down a stop, make the shutter speed  a stop slower, make 16 exposures… until you get to 1/8 second.
  • Mount the lens on an a7R.
  • Clip the a7R into the head using a RRS L-bracket.
  • Set the self-timer on the a7R to 2 seconds.
  • Repeat the series.
  • Develop in DCRAW with AHD demosacing.
  • Crop and analyze for horizontal edge and vertical edge MTF50 in Imatest.
  • Export the results to Excel, crunch the stats, and graph.

Here’s what I got for the vertical slanted edge:

dcrawotussledmtf50v

For some reason I didn’t get the 1/500 second images from the D810. User error with the intervalometer?

The solid lines are the average of the MTF50 values for the 16 exposures, measures in cycles per picture height. The light lines are the averages plus and minus one standard deviation.

It looks like maybe if I had the 1/500 second D810 data point, the a7R and D810 numbers would be pretty close. I’ll have to run some more tests.

If we look at the horizontal slanted edge, here’s what we see:

dcrawotussledmtf50h

Note that 1/250 is the worst shutter speed for the a7R; that’s the peculiar high-speed a7R shutter shock at work.

More tests coming up.

The Last Word

← a7R vs D810 resolution — DCRAW development Testing high res camera/lens sharpness across cameras →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.