• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica WATE at 21mm

Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica WATE at 21mm

July 30, 2015 JimK Leave a Comment

This is part 10 in a series of posts on a prototype of the Kolari Vision thin-stack sensor modification for the Sony a7II. The series starts here.

The Leica 16-18-21mm f/4 Tri-Elmar (WATE)  is an excellent performer on the Sony a7x cameras considering that it’s a zoom lens, though it does not perform as well at 21mm as at 16mm.. Its exit pupil is far enough from the sensor plane that the corners are generally sharp. How is it on the Kolari-modified a7II?

The scene wide open at f/4 and 21mm with both the standard and thin-stack cameras. I focused on the lower left corner:

 

Standard
Standard
Kolari
Kolari

Same color shift we saw in the earlier pictures.

In the lower left corner, wide open and stopping down at whole apertures, enlarged 3:1, processed in Lightroom with daylight white balance, a one-stop boost to compensate for lens falloff, and otherwise default settings:

 

Standard f/4
Standard f/4
Kolari f/4
Kolari f/4

There is definitely less smearing with the Kolari. You can especially see it in the isolated branches. The standard stack does quite well for a zoom lens wide open, and the Kolari version is a big step up from even that.

Standard f/5.6
Standard f/5.6
Kolari f/5.6
Kolari f/5.6

The standard stack is looking very good. The Kolari-modded unit is looking great.

Standard f/8
Standard f/8
Kolari f/8
Kolari f/8

The best f-stop for the corners for both cameras. Kolari a tad ahead.

Standard f/11
Standard f/11
Kolari f/11
Kolari f/11

In both cases, almost as good as f/8.

Standard f/16
Standard f/16
Kolari f/16
Kolari f/16

We can see definite diffraction effects. Kolari is better, probably because of the lack of an AA filter.

Standard f/22
Standard f/22
Kolari f/4\22
Kolari f/22

Serious diffraction in both cases.

I had thought that this lenses was unaffected by sensor stack thickness. I now know I was wrong.

 

The Last Word

← Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica WATE at 16mm Kolari thin-stack mod on a7II vs M240 — Leica 28/2.8 Elmarit →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.