• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Focus shift and LoCA in the Coastal 60/4 at 1:10

Focus shift and LoCA in the Coastal 60/4 at 1:10

May 7, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

This is a continuation of testing of  the following macro lenses :

  • Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro
  • Leica 100mm f/2.8 Apo Macro-Elmarit-R
  • Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar ZF
  • Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor G VR
  • and, now, the Coastal Optical 60mm f/4 UV-VIS-IR

The test starts here:

Focus shift and LoCA in the Leica-R 100/2.8 Apo Macro

A few have expressed some surprise at the performance of the Coastal 60/4 at f/4 and f/5.6, which has prompted me to rerun the tests at 1:10 (one tenth of life size) magnification.

Here are the LoCA results at f/4:

coastal loca f4 1 to 10

The vertical axis is MTF50, measured in cycles per picture height (cy/ph). The horizontal axis is camera position shift in cm (not mm, as was the case in the 1:2 tests). The points on the left side of the graph are with the camera farther away from the subject than the points on the right. I used a 500 um (0.5 mm) step size. The three raw channels are plotted.

The 1:2 results are here:

Focus Shift and LoCA in the Coastal 60/4 macro

There is more LoCA at 1:10 than at 1:2 magnification, but the MTF50 numbers are quite a bit higher.

Here are the 1:10 results for f/5.6, f/8, and f/11:

coastal loca f56 1 to 10

coastal loca f8 1 to 10

coastal loca f11 1 to 10

And here are the focus shift results:

coastal gres focus shift 1 to 10

For reference, here are the focus shift results at 1:2:

coastal focus shift

Don’t forget that the horizontal scale is different: mm in the 1:2 graph and cm in the 1:10 graph.

Two things stand out. The lens is much sharper at 1:10, and the focus shift is in the opposite direction. Is there a magnification between 1:2 and 1:10 where there is hardly any focus shift? Probably, but I’m not going to take the time to go searching for it. Did I mention that these tests are labor-intensive?

The Last Word

← Kitchen optics and LoCA Focus shift and LoCA in the Sony 90mm f/2.8 at 1:10 →

Trackbacks

  1. Coastal 60/4 UV-VIS-IR on Fuji GFX 50S says:
    April 22, 2017 at 5:30 pm

    […] 60 mm f/4 UV-VIS-IR. This is an apo lens on steroids, being corrected for UR and UV wavelengths as well as visible ones. I’ve tested it several times (here, here, and here), and found that it is pretty sharp, but […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.