• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / 2012 / Archives for January 2012

Archives for January 2012

Noise vs resolution — part 5

January 26, 2012 JimK 2 Comments

I have exciting news. At least, it’s exciting to me. Your reaction may be, “Kasson, you really need to get out more.” Anyway, after many unsuccessful attempts, detailed in the previous posts, to tame the NEX-7 high-ISO noise by reducing the resolution of the image, I finally found something that works. Here’s the recipe. Go… [Read More]

The Last Word

Noise vs resolution — part 4

January 25, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

In search of optimum tradeoff of noise and resolution in a 5 megapixel resize of NEX-5 and NEX-7 images, I tried a series of averaging operations before the resize. The one that worked best for the NEX-7 test image was a 2-pixel box blur in Photoshop followed by a resize in Perfect Resize using the… [Read More]

The Last Word

Noise vs resolution — part 3

January 24, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

Next I tried one of the proprietary resolution-changing programs, Perfect Resize. I used the default parameters. The crop of the NEX-5 image looks like this: The crop of the NEX-7 image looks like this: The crop of the D3s image looks like this: Here’s the Nikon image sharpened to match the Sony images. It’s night… [Read More]

Technology Hall of Shame, Uncategorized

Noise vs resolution — part 2

January 24, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

Bicubic sharper is probably not the best interpolation technique to average out noise. I next tried just plain bicubic. The crop of the NEX-5 image looks like this: The crop of the NEX-7 image looks like this: The crop of the D3s image looks like this: Here’s the Nikon image sharpened to match the Sony… [Read More]

Uncategorized

Noise vs resolution — part 1

January 24, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

It’s a truism that sensors with larger photosites have less noise. But you can reduce noise by combining information from small photosites into fewer pixels than with a standard Bayer conversion. In my mind, this is ideally performed before demosaicing, but raw converters don’t, in my experience, allow to to choose the resolution rendered by… [Read More]

The Last Word

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 6
  • Next Page »
January 2012
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
« Dec   Feb »

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.