the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / The Last Word / Noise vs resolution — part 1

Noise vs resolution — part 1

January 24, 2012 JimK Leave a Comment

It’s a truism that sensors with larger photosites have less noise. But you can reduce noise by combining information from small photosites into fewer pixels than with a standard Bayer conversion. In my mind, this is ideally performed before demosaicing, but raw converters don’t, in my experience, allow to to choose the resolution rendered by the demosaicing operation.

With my NEX-7 studies, I’ve been wondering how much can be done after raw conversion to trade off resolution and noise. If you’ve been reading this blog a while, you know that I attacked the question by conducting an experiment. I took three cameras with APS-C sensors, and different pixel pitches. The first one, the Sony NEX-7, has 24 megapixels. The second, the Sony NEX-5, has 14 megapixels. The third, the Nikon D3s, has a bit over 5 megapixels.

“Just a minute here,” I hear you saying, “the D3s has 12 megapixels, and it has a full frame sensor.” Indeed it does, but it also has a mode that induces an in-camera crop to an APS-C-sized sensor.

To make sure the comparisons were apples to apples, I used the same lens on each camera: the AF Nikkor 35mm f/2 D. It has an aperture ring, so I was able to use it on the two Sony cameras with the Novaflex adapter.

I made three photographs, all at f/5.6 and a 50th, with the ISO set to 3200. I focused the two Sony cameras using manual focusing with maximum magnification. I used autofocus for the Nikon, which probably slightly adversely affected the results – I probably should have used liveview. I locked the mirror up on the Nikon; the two Sony’s have no need of that. I converted the images from raw in Lightroom. 3.6, with noise reduction turned off.  Here’s the one from the Nikon:

Then I reduced the resolution of the two Sony images down to 2784 x 1848. For the images in this post, I used Photoshop bicubic sharper, which Adobe recommends for reduction. I cropped all the images to 360 pixels wide. Then I doubled the magnification using nearest-neighbor, which yields a two-by-two array of identical pixels for each pixel in the original image. The JPEG compression used for the web smooths over these clumps. Each camera had internal noise reduction turned off. Each camera was set to produce images in the Adobe 1998 RGB color space, but all images have been converted to sRGB for web presentation.

The crop of the NEX-5 image looks like this:

The crop of the NEX-7 image looks like this:

The crop of the D3s image looks like this:

There’s a lot more noise in the two Sony images, but the D3s image is softer. The bicubic sharper interpolation is sharpening the two Sony images. I used unsharp masking in Photoshop to make the Nikon image about as sharp as the Sony ones. It’s still less noisy:

The Last Word

← NEX-7 — purple corners compared to NEX-5 Noise vs resolution — part 2 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.