• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / 2014 / Archives for March 2014

Archives for March 2014

The intellectual underpinnings of MTF analysis of handheld images

March 12, 2014 JimK 1 Comment

A few days ago, I made a post with a handwaving defense of the use of slanted edge MTF metrics for analyzing handheld image sharpness. Today, I’d like to take another crack at it, this time with more rigor. The upside? A clearer basis for the capabilities and the limitations of the technique. The downside?… [Read More]

The Last Word

D800E vibration testing

March 11, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

A reader has asked if I could take the methods that I developed for the handheld testing and apply them to tripod-mounted testing. The MTF-based technique offers the ability to test more conditions because of its automation, and provides objective, machine-generated results. However, the old procedure, with its visual analysis of ISO 12233 images, is… [Read More]

The Last Word

An accidental handholding test

March 10, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

I think I have very-late-onset dyslexia. I reported yesterday on handholding tests with the Nikon 58mm f/1.4. The graphs were actually of the second set of tests I attempted. When I did the first ones, this was the result: Very strange, I thought. The electronic flash resolution was much lower than I thought it would… [Read More]

The Last Word

Testing handholding

March 9, 2014 JimK Leave a Comment

In the fall of 1958, when I was a photographer for my high school newspaper, I borrowed a Linotype font chart from the newspaper office, taped it to the darkroom wall, lit it with two blue-dipped photofloods, metered it with a Weston Master II, and made a bunch of handheld exposures at various shutter speeds… [Read More]

The Last Word

Handholding the a7 and a7R, part 3

March 9, 2014 JimK 1 Comment

I’ve been asked to compare a7R handheld sharpness to that of the Nikon D800E. Here goes, although this is adding one more imponderable to the mix. In the previous testing, the lens was the same for the images made with both cameras. Not just the same model, the very same lens. Since handheld testing requires… [Read More]

The Last Word

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • Next Page »
March 2014
S M T W T F S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Feb   Apr »

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.