• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / 2021 / Archives for November 2021

Archives for November 2021

Scanning 4×5 TMax 100 and stitching with PTGui

November 29, 2021 JimK Leave a Comment

In the last post I showed you what happens when you use Lightroom to stitch two vertical orientation scans into one horizontal orientation one. Lightroom amps up the contrast and or the sharpening. In an attempt to get around that, I stitched the stacked images from the last post using PTGui 11.7 and 12.8. The… [Read More]

GFX 100, GFX 100S

Stitch scanning 4×5 TMax 100

November 29, 2021 JimK Leave a Comment

Yesterday, I reported on using pixel shift on the GFX 100S to scan negatives. There is another way to increase resolution, and that’s stitching. I turned the camera into portrait orientation and performed a two-view set of captures for stitching. This meant that the 4 inch dimension of the negative was imaged to about 40… [Read More]

GFX 100, GFX 100S

What pitch do you need to scan 4×5 TMax 100?

November 28, 2021 JimK 2 Comments

In my last post, I showed you results obtained by scanning TMax 100 6×6 (cm) negatives with the GFX 100S both with and without pixel shifting. Today, I’ll do the same with 4×5 (inch) negatives. Here’s the “scanner”. From left to right: light source, negative carrier on Cognisys rail, lens shade, Rodenstock HR Digarono 105… [Read More]

GFX 100, GFX 100S, The Last Word

What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100?

November 27, 2021 JimK 2 Comments

I’ve been scanning up a storm with my new home-brew GFX 100S scanner. I’ve been getting what I consider to be good scans — certainly as good as I was able to get with my now abandoned-and-unsupported-by-the-factory Imacon Precision III. But I wondered if I could get better ones if I used the GFX 100S… [Read More]

GFX 100, GFX 100S

Poor man’s C1 Cube?

November 21, 2021 JimK 1 Comment

I saw an ad for a 500 buck small geared tripod head that looked a lot like an Arca Swiss C1 Cube. I bit. Here’s what it looks like next to the C1: It appears to be reasonably well built, but there’s no yaw possible below the pitch and roll axes. It needs to be… [Read More]

The Last Word

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next Page »
November 2021
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930  
« Oct   Dec »

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.