• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Poor man’s C1 Cube?

Poor man’s C1 Cube?

November 21, 2021 JimK 1 Comment

I saw an ad for a 500 buck small geared tripod head that looked a lot like an Arca Swiss C1 Cube. I bit.

Here’s what it looks like next to the C1:

It appears to be reasonably well built, but there’s no yaw possible below the pitch and roll axes. It needs to be attached to a base that provides yaw, at least for my uses. It is fitted with an Arca dovetail on the bottom, so that’s presumably what the designer thought, too.

 

 

Here’s what it looks like in use:

 

Plusses:

  • Small
  • Light
  • Cheap
  • Well constructed

Negatives:

  • Only plus and minus 15 degrees of roll and pitch
  • No geared yaw
  • No base yaw

Conclusion: won’t replace the C1, but might keep you from having to buy more than one.

 

The Last Word

← Amp glow in Fujifilm GFX 50S Mark I and II What pitch do you need to scan 6×6 TMax 100? →

Comments

  1. Denis says

    November 22, 2021 at 4:06 am

    I want to note that it’s more of a Linhof 3D Micro “copy”. To be precise, it uses worm gear like 3D Micro and has same roll and pitch ranges (and 3D micro has base yaw like Cube, but this one does not).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

December 2025
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
« Nov    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Lou Jost on Leica 280/4 Apo-Telyt R on GFX 50R in infrared
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • JimK on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Craig Stocks on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Tim Wilson on Why wide-angle lenses stretch the edges of the frame
  • Erik Kaffehr on Sharpness and aliasing, one more time
  • Scott on Sharpness and aliasing, one more time
  • JimK on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • Erik Kaffehr on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • phanter on Averaging captures, precision effects

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.