• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7III / a7III long-exposure spatial filtering

a7III long-exposure spatial filtering

June 9, 2018 JimK 5 Comments

This is a continuation of a series of posts on the Sony a7III.   You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “a7III”.

There was a recent posting to the effect that the spatial filtering (aka “Star Eater”) present in many a7x cameras and firmware releases at shutter speeds of longer than 3.2 seconds has been “fixed” in the a7III. The spatial filtering is different, but it has not disappeared.

Here are the spectra of 600-pixel central crops from dark field images made with the a7III at ISO 1000 at various shutter speeds using EFCS, and single shot shutter mode, and asking the camera to write uncompressed raw files.

 

 

 

 

 

What is clear is that there are differences. Former cameras exhibited flat response at 3.2 seconds and longer, whereas with the a7III there is roll-off visible even at 1/1000 second. The roll-off is pretty much the same until 4 seconds, where it gets worse.

a7III

← The Zone System and digital cameras, part 3 Fuji 250/4 on GFX 50S — screeening →

Comments

  1. Dr. Gary says

    June 14, 2018 at 11:44 am

    I thought the issue was with bulb exposures over 30 seconds.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      June 14, 2018 at 12:01 pm

      Years ago the issue used to be with bulb exposures only, but Sony “improved” their firmware.

      Reply
  2. cheung man hoi says

    July 23, 2018 at 3:20 am

    If had too choose between a7r2 a7-3 for astro usage.
    Is 12bit still better than 7-3 filter problem?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 23, 2018 at 1:02 pm

      Is 12bit still better than 7-3 filter problem?

      For work where the accuracy of the color of the stars is important, and that as many stars as possible are recorded, I think so.

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a7III Technical Exploration: Star Eater, Silent Shutter, PDAF Stripping, and Weather Sealing | Sony Addict says:
    June 14, 2018 at 8:38 am

    […] Eater is most certainly not fixed according to Jim’s testing. The long exposure spacial filtering used by all Sony cameras still exists in the Sony a7III when […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.