• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7III / Arca-Swiss plate dimensions

Arca-Swiss plate dimensions

June 30, 2018 JimK 18 Comments

Two days ago, I reviewed the SmallRig plate for the Sony a7III/a7RIII/a9 cameras. I found that the shoe that engages the tripod head clamp was wider than the Really Right Stuff (RRS) plates, making engagement with the cam-lock quick-release RRS clamps very tight. Today, I measured the dimensions of the bottom of a group of RRS and SmallRig plates. Here’s what I got:

It’s pretty clear that the SmallRig design center is greater than that of RRS.

I did not measure the angle and inner dimension of the plates, because I don’t have the tools to do that.

Some interesting reading on the Arca-Swiss “standard”:

http://www.jobu-design.com/Arca-Swiss-is-NOT-a-standard-time-for-a-change_b_8.html

https://www.tripodhead.com/products/product-details2.cfm?product=arca-swiss-geometry

http://www.afximages.com/stuff/arca-plates-xref.html

http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/patents

 

 

a7III, a7RIII, a9

← Sony a7III, a9, a7RIII SmallRig camera plate Sony a7III, a7RIII, a9 shutter latency — EFCS →

Comments

  1. Matthew O'Brien says

    June 30, 2018 at 9:55 am

    I have given up using the RSS Quick Release clamps and use a screw clamp instead. Too many variations of sizes, especially if you need to mix brands or use specialist devices such as focus rails, etc…

    Reply
  2. CarVac says

    June 30, 2018 at 1:09 pm

    The difference you see there is just how much of a round they put on the edge of the dovetail. RRS rounds theirs pretty aggressively.

    Though, as you say, you have no means of measuring it, you need to measure the distance between the lines where plane of the dovetail faces and the bottom of the plate meet.

    If the difference were truly 1.5 millimeters as you measured, the lever lock would have no hope of closing.

    Reply
    • Frans van den Bergh says

      July 3, 2018 at 6:06 am

      One way to measure the dovetail is to use two dowel pins. The pins should have a large enough diameter that they touch the dovetails about halfway up the slope.

      Place the dowel pins and the dovetail on a flat surface, and measure across the pins. This will allow you to measure the width of the dovetail at a consistent height from the bottom. (The same method can be used to measure the width of the inside of the female dovetail, depending on how the clearance at the bottom was machined.)

      With two sets of dowel pins of different diameters you can measure the angle of the dovetails too.

      There could still be differences in the amount of clearance left in the height of the dovetail, though.

      Reply
      • JimK says

        July 4, 2018 at 8:24 am

        Great idea, Frans!

        Reply
  3. Andre Y says

    June 30, 2018 at 5:48 pm

    Jim, RRS has a mechanical spec for their dovetail standard. 38.1mm sounds like it’s exactly what RRS specifies, or 1.5 inches in their spec’s units.

    See here: http://www.reallyrightstuff.com/patents

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 2, 2018 at 12:25 pm

      Thanks for the information, Andre. I’ll include that link in the body of the post.

      Reply
  4. Don Chaps says

    June 30, 2018 at 7:50 pm

    Personally, I use a clamp that has both a screw and a lever. It allows me to use any mount, small variations don’t matter. Once you use the screw to adjust to your mount, you can then use the lever for quick attachment and release.

    Reply
  5. ben hahn says

    October 15, 2018 at 10:05 am

    I just bought a smallrig plate for my sony a7iii. I tried it to an alca-swiss compatible manfrotto head but it didn’t fit at all! I mean at all! I tried to squeeze the plate into the ball head with no good result. Both plates from manfrotto and joby work well with the ball head though. I guess I should change the ball head because of the plate?

    other than that, it feels and weighs good with the camera.

    Reply
  6. IoriS says

    April 13, 2019 at 1:43 am

    I had the same problem with the SmallRig L plate for my Panasonic G9; the plate was too wide. Actually, they designed the plate with only one side cut out where it slides onto the ball head clamp. I informed the mfr about this defect, and they only said to return it if I didn’t like it. Rather than waste postage on shipping it back, I had a local machine shop cut out the other side. My advice is to spend the extra money and buy the RRS L plates.

    Reply
  7. Sean says

    May 1, 2019 at 4:24 am

    I have several Chinese ‘Arca Swiss style’ plates and clamps of various sorts and brands. The dimensions of the dovetails differ, in realtive terms, quite a lot. In one the 45deg face of the plate’s dovetail is very low relative to the base, so low in fact that the plate will only lock in the clamp it came with.
    What is most disconcerting is that the centre line of the plate often does not correspond to the centre line of the the clamp. This is even the case with a 360 deg panorama head where I would have thought this was one of the design necessities, I have corrected for the latter with a cross slide but it would be better if I didn’t have too

    Where a plate will not fit into a screw lock type clamp if you can get to the end of the clamp’s main screw you may be able to loosen an axial retaining screw that screws into the clamp screw’s stud,. Make sure the screw driver is a good fit and pressed and held into the screw with appreciable force as it is likely that large amounts of screw locking liquid have been used to hold the retaining screw. Once the retaining screw is out or, if very stiff, backed off a bit the plate should drop in.

    Reply
  8. Mitch W says

    May 24, 2019 at 5:51 am

    I purchased a used RRS quick release and some of my plates didn’t tighten up in the clamp. I ended up reselling it. Now I only use the screw clamp that came with my Induro tripod head. Be careful with RRS clamps. RRS said they are made for only the RRS plates.

    Reply
  9. Daniel Ockeloen says

    December 4, 2019 at 4:45 am

    Little late of a reply but since this popped up again. all the smallrig arca products are now designed to allow for both ‘specs’ to work including the new version of the l-bracket discussed here. The 2122v2 was done as a production update and been on sale for many months and should work fine. Also newer ones for 2236 and the now new model for the a7R4… (2417) and the upcoming pro version for that one.

    Reply
  10. Robert Gerard says

    February 7, 2020 at 11:12 pm

    Pretty impressive measuring, to one micron. Would you care to share with us your measuring technique?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      February 8, 2020 at 6:45 am

      Using an electronic micrometer with micron readout and averaging several readings. However, all those figures to the right of the decimal point are not significant.

      Reply
  11. Bob Brown says

    December 22, 2024 at 5:40 pm

    I’ve found Arca-Swiss style mounts and plates to be far too fussy for practical use. With the thicket of varying dimensions among manufacturers out there, I’ve resorted to the tried-and-true Manfrotto RC-2 lever action holder and corresponding plates. Bulletproof and much faster to change cameras in the field. Very secure as well. Any argument against this?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      December 22, 2024 at 7:14 pm

      Chacon a son gout. I’ve never liked the Manfrotto plates.

      Reply
      • Bob Brown says

        December 22, 2024 at 11:12 pm

        Why? I’ve used them effortlessly for years with no problems for sports photography where switching cameras is commonplace.

        Reply
        • JimK says

          December 25, 2024 at 2:33 pm

          I did not find the lock strong enough or stiff enough.

          Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.