• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / a7RIV / Sony 20mm f/1.8 focus curvature

Sony 20mm f/1.8 focus curvature

March 14, 2020 JimK 5 Comments

Roger Cicala has come up with a quick and dirty focus curvature test that I’ve used before.  Just make a photograph of a flat textured surface at an angle well away from the image field focus plane, then bring it into Photoshop and invoke Filter>Stylize>Find Edges.

It works great at long and near-normal focal lengths:

 

If the dark band is straight, then there’s no focus curvature. Neat. But I’ve never tried it with a lens as short as the Sony 20/1.8. What the hey, here goes nothing.

Sony 20/1.8 at f/1.8

There is a problem. The combination of vignetting and MTF falloff away from the lens axis means that the dark band doesn’t extend far from the center of the image. Still, there is curvature visible; the focal plane gets nearer to the camera as you move away from the lens axis.

Sony 20/1.8 at f/2.8

When you stop down, the band becomes broader because of DOF, and also extends more towards the edges, because the vignetting and off-axis sharpness loss goes down.

Here are results with two other lenses of similar focal length:

Loxia 21/2.8 at f/2.8

The Loxia appears to have slightly more curvature.

Batis 18/2.8 at f/2.8

The Batis has so much DOF even wide open that it’s hard to draw firm conclusions, but it appears to have the same kind of focus curvature.

a7RIV

← Chromaticity shifts with the a7RIV, Z7, and GFX 100 Sony 20/1.8 vs Batis 18/2.8 — Siemens Star →

Comments

  1. Peter says

    March 15, 2020 at 5:34 am

    Jim, I find its worth adding a saturation layer in photoshop and desaturate the image to monotone as a final step in Rogers method: it makes the field curvature better defined without the visual contamination caused by the residual colour.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      March 15, 2020 at 6:29 am

      That sounds like a good idea.

      Reply
  2. Kenneth Sky says

    March 16, 2020 at 11:57 am

    Thanks for including the Batis 18 in the test.

    Reply
  3. Mike Nelson Pedde says

    March 21, 2020 at 1:16 pm

    I use Affinity Photo rather than Photoshop, but there’s a similar feature: Filter/Detect/Detect Edges.

    Haven’t tried it for lens curvature, but I do have a Laowa 12mm rectilinear lens so it might be interesting to have a look at it.

    Mike.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Focus curvature with the 20mm f/1.8 Nikkor S says:
    March 27, 2020 at 2:42 pm

    […] There is some focus curvature, with the focal plane bending toward the camera as you get further off axis. The Sony 20/1.8 G lens exhibited similar behavior. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.