It’s taken almost a year to write this review. I received a review copy of the Hasselblad XCD 90 mm f/2.5 V lens in January. I performed most of my evaluations in the spring of last year. And then I waited for the lens to ship so that I could publish my thoughts. And waited…. [Read More]
Why Foveon images are so noisy
While I was looking at the Sigma DP1 Merrill Studio Scene raw file, I decided to look at some raw histograms. This is the histogram of the whole image: It’s a 12-bit analog to digital converter (ADC). The putative blue channel (what I call the white channel in a Foveon sensor) has about 50,000 pixels… [Read More]
More on Foveon image processing
I’ve never owned a Foveon camera, but I’ve owned many cameras that could capture 3 color channels at each pixel location. The cameras I’ve owned don’t produce images that look like a lot of Foveon camera images I’ve seen. I’ve been curious as to why, and have reported in this blog on some of the… [Read More]
Sample variation in the Fujifilm GF 100-200 at 200mm, revisited
A reader chided me for not using the same methodology when testing my copy of the Fujifilm GF 100-200 and another reader’s copy. To review, I tested my copy with a very complicated program that analyzes stacks of focus bracketed images, white balances the raw MTF curves, fits curves to critical measures, and calculates metrics… [Read More]
Where does the Foveon crunchiness come from?
Many people have noticed an artificial, unnatural “crunchiness” in images made with the Foveon sensor. Whether you think that’s a good thing or a bad thing is subjective. Many of the Foveonisti think it’s great. I think it’s ugly. Where does this wonderful — to some — or yucky — to others — characteristic come… [Read More]
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- …
- 573
- Next Page »