• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / D850 / Nikon D850 histograms vs ISO setting

Nikon D850 histograms vs ISO setting

October 30, 2017 JimK 1 Comment

This is the second post in a series of Nikon D850 tests. The series starts here.

You can tell a lot about how a camera works with the lens cap on. In this post, I’m going to take a look at the histograms of the entire frame of D850 dark-field images, all at 1/1600 second (and f/22 on a CV 120/2.5 Apo-Lanthar, if it makes any difference to you), but with various ISO settings. I tested all the ISO settings from 64 to 25,600, but I’ll show you only the ones that I think are informative.

ISO 64

At base ISO, we have a nice tight histogram. 14 bits is more than adequate given the level of read noise. The black point is at 400 counts, which is more-or-less consistent with the latest Nikons. 

ISO 100

No surprises at ISO 100, except for missing codes in the red and blue channels. This is undoubtedly the result of Nikon’s white balance prescaling. I wish they wouldn’t do that.

ISO 320

This is the highest ISO setting before the conversion gain increases on the D850. This is a good setting to stay the heck away from.

ISO 400

Much less noise at ISO 400 than at ISO 320. The conversion gain has increased. This is DR-Pix technology.

ISO 800

The noise at ISO 800 isn’t far from the noise at ISO 320.

ISO 1250

 

ISO 1600

On the transition from ISO 1250 to ISO 1600, the black point moves lower. I have no idea what that’s about.

ISO 4000

 

ISO 6400

 

ISO 8000

When the ISO knob is turned to 8000, we get the first indications of straight digital multiplication, as shown by the gaps in the green channels. There is probably little reason to use higher ISOs than 6400 with this camera.

ISO 12800

Now there is so much digital gain that we essentially have a 13-bit camera. No problem, though, since the noise is so much greater than that.

ISO 25,600

At ISO 25,600, it’s a 12-bit camera. Again, there’s nothing wrong with that, but you are usually better off pushing in post.

This is very nice performance, without a lot of the weirdness of the D5 equivalent test.

 

D850

← How fast is the Nikon 850 electronic shutter? Nikon D850 EDR →

Comments

  1. Anton says

    October 31, 2017 at 7:47 am

    Jim,

    Your tests as always are great and this time it’s pretty clear (this time) how to adapt your work to our real world settings.

    It would be nice if you would more often make recommendations people could adopt and it would increase your readership.

    Looking forward to more on the 850.

    Anton

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.