• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 II / GFX 100 II, X2D — blur and distortion with IBIS and ES

GFX 100 II, X2D — blur and distortion with IBIS and ES

October 12, 2023 JimK 5 Comments

This is the 20th post in a series of tests of the Fujifilm GFX 100, Mark II. You can find all the posts in this series by going to the Categories pane in the right hand panel and clicking on “GFX 100 II”.

Some have been complaining of blur and distortion when using in-body image stabilization (IBIS) and electronic shutter (ES) simultaneously with the GFX 100 II.

I am reminded of a conversation I once had with my internist:

Me: When I run on pavement, the balls of my feet hurt.

Doc: Then don’t run  on pavement.

I didn’t think that was the right answer, and I found a podiatrist who fixed it so I could run on pavement. But there are echoes of that conversation in how I’d deal with this issue.

Photographer: I get blur and distortion when I use IBIS and ES together with the camera handheld.

Me: Don’t use ES with the camera handheld. Use EFCS unless you desperately need silent shutter operation.

I took an X2D with a 90 mm lens I”m not going to talk about, set it to 16-bit precision, ES, IBIS, ISO 1600, 1/800 second. I didn’t take any special care to hold it super steady.

This is what I got:

X2D 16 bits IBIS ES

IBIS is a good thing, but it can’t completely deal with this situation.

I did the same with the GFX 100 II and a 110 mm f/2 GF lens. The lines were pretty straight. I went back and made another series, and this time I wasn’t careful with vibration at all.

GFX 100 II 16 bit IBIS ES

Yep. Distortion.

By the way, 1/3 of a second — which is the scan time of the GFX 100 II and X2D ES at 16-bit precision. Is a long time, and lots of people think the exposure is over before it really is, and move the camera too soon. If you to that, you’ll get something like this:

 

GFX 100 II 16 bit IBIS ES

By the way, if this little uncontrolled experiment is any indication, the GFX 100 II has better IBIS than the X2D.

GFX 100 II

← Taming a hard desktop Fujifilm GFX 100 II precision in CH shutter mode →

Comments

  1. Joris says

    October 26, 2023 at 2:07 am

    I found something about this, no way!
    I contacted Fuji support Germany about this issue this morning and I seem to have correctly identified the issue as being related to the IBIS.
    Fuji support put it solely on the ES, but I found that to be unbelievable at 160th of a second, There was no way I managed to blur the lower fifth of the image at that speed several times only due to the redout speed of the ES.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      October 26, 2023 at 6:11 pm

      When you turn off IBIS, does the issue go away for you?

      Reply
    • CHUONG TOAN T DANG says

      January 21, 2024 at 11:54 am

      I did have the same issues , I have nothing to do with ibis, when shooting through eye view with the electronic shutter almost every other pictures taken were blurr and deformed, I did contact with fuji and they told me this is the downfall of gfx100 2 and there is no fix for it, if you want to get away from it when shooting with eye view you have to switch to mechanical shutter, I hope this will help you.

      Reply
      • JimK says

        January 21, 2024 at 2:51 pm

        You can make lemonade:

        https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/making-lemonade-from-the-gfx-slow-electronic-shutter/

        https://blog.kasson.com/the-last-word/macro-slit-scans/

        Reply
  2. Anthony says

    April 3, 2024 at 3:34 am

    Not sure why anyone would bother with an electronic shutter vs the leaf shutter that is in the fantastic lenses like the 55 and even the old h series. Feels like an experiment with such a large amount of data to process. I cared more about the e shutter before the x2d had the 90 available and was using adapted lenses. I really loved the 55 and the hc50-110 on the 0,8 converter. I did use my old mamiya 80 1.9 at times but is would switch to the lower 14 bit in order to tale advantage of the faster read out.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.