• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Fuji GFX 100 EDR vs shutter speed

Fuji GFX 100 EDR vs shutter speed

August 2, 2019 JimK 4 Comments

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100”.

In the  last post, we looked at how the engineering dynamic range (EDR), defined here as full scale over the read noise, varied with ISO setting. In this post, I’ll show you how it varies with shutter speed. I chose ISO 1000, 14-bit raw precision, and electronic shutter for the test conditions.

I measured the noise by looking at a 600×600-pixel crop in each raw plane just far enough to the left of the center of the frame so that it didn’t include the center column. This is a benign set of curves. There is very little change until the exposures get to be a second or two long, and after that you lose about 0.2 stops of EDR for every doubling of the shutter speed.

GFX 100

← GFX 100 EDR vs ISO Fuji GFX 100 photon transfer curves →

Comments

  1. David Berryrieser says

    August 2, 2019 at 11:09 pm

    The GFX 50S has a ‘Long Exposure Noise Reduction’ setting. On my old Canon DSLRs this setting would result in the camera doing dark frame subtraction after a certain shutter speed. Do you know how this works on the Fuji cameras? Are they using a pre-recorded dark current estimation file, or is it just a noise reduction algo applied only to the JPEGS?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 3, 2019 at 6:31 am

      I don’t know the answer to those questions, but I probably soon will. I’ll post information then.

      Reply
    • Rico Pfirstinger says

      August 3, 2019 at 3:03 pm

      IIRC, all X series cameras offer the Long Exposure Noise Reduction feature, which performs a dark frame subtraction. When Long Exposure Noise Reduction is turned on, the camera decides if it needs to take a second exposure based on ISO setting and shutter speed.

      DFS takes a second dark frame exposure of (at least) the same duration right after the actual exposure and merges both exposures in a single RAW file. This can be practical in many situations, but also quite unpractical in others. For interval shooting, stacked star trails etc., I’d turn it off and only take one manual dark frame after a series is complete and subtract it in Photoshop or a similar processing program that offers layers with typical blending modes.

      Reply
      • David Berryrieser says

        August 3, 2019 at 11:44 pm

        Confirmed. For longer shutter speeds my X-T2 appears to take a dark frame after the initial exposure and just says “Processing” on the screen while doing it. I can’t replicate that behavior on the GFX 50S using any combination of shutter speeds or ISO.

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.