This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100S. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100S”. Since the strategy will work fine with the GFX 100, I’m also tagging it that way.
I have previously performed a quantitative analysis of the GFX 100 read noise performance versus ISO setting. That post also applies to the GFX 100S, which shares the same sensor. I also did a photon transfer curve analysis. Then I made a series of posts showing visually what’s going on with the camera in that regard. The first of those is here.
Some conclusions:
- The camera is close to ISOless from 100 to 400, and even closer from 500 on up.
- There is a substantial improvement in input-referred read noise when you go from ISO 400 to ISO 500, but that improvement is material only in the deepest shadows.
So, assuming that you are setting your f-stops, shutter speeds, and ISO settings manually, what is the best strategy?
If you can, expose to the right (ETTR) at base ISO. This is a no-brainer and is true for just about any digital camera. What keeps it from working all the time?
- You can’t tell from the in-camera histogram whether the raw file is saturating. UniWB helps, but most people don’t want to go to all that trouble and look at green preview images, and even UniWB is not a panacea.
- You may need more light on the sensor. Depth of field (DOF) requirements and dealing with camera motion and subject motion often conspire to make the ideal exposure impractical.
So now what, assuming that you’re shooting RAW?
- Decide on the f-stop you need based on DOF, not the light.
- Decide on the shutter speed you need based on motion blur, not the light.
- Then set the ISO; deciding that gets a bit more complicated.
The first thing to do is figure out the ISO that would place the significant highlights on the right side of the histogram; let’s call that the metered ISO. I want to reserve ETTR for base ISO exposures, and we’ve already decided that this scene won’t let us do ETTR at base ISO.
- If that ISO is 100 or as much as one stop over, set the ISO to 100 and make the exposure. If that ISO is 500 or as much as three stops over, set the ISO to 500 and make the exposure. You’ll get more highlight protection, and it won’t cost you anything significant in shadow noise.
- If that ISO is between 200 and 320, decide if you need the last bit of shadow signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). If you don’t, set the ISO to 200, take the shot, and get some extra highlight protection.
- If that ISO is 400, decide if you could do with bit less highlight protection. If not, set the ISO to 400. If yes, set it to 500 and enjoy lower super-deep-shadow SNR.
- If that ISO is between 500 and 3200, and you think you’ve got the highlights handled, set the ISO to 500, and use that exposure. This will produce images that are, by conventional metering standards, more and more “underexposured” as the metered ISO rises.
- If that ISO is over 3200, set the ISO setting to three stops under the metered ISO. Three stops of extra highlight protection should be enough for almost any scene, and pushing too much in postproduction can cause some color shifts.
That sounds complicated, but once you’ve gone through the steps a few times, you can figure out the camera settings you need instantly.
Let’s work through a few examples.
From the LV or sample histogram, you decide that that sunset-with-foreground you’re shooting needs f/11, and the wind means you need 1/250. But the histogram tells you that, in order to get a right-populated histogram you need ISO 320. The picture is all about the highlights. Shoot with the ISO dial set to 100, so you’ll get plenty of protection.
You’re shooting the Milky Way, and with the lens set wide open at f/2.8 and a 15-second exposure, which is all you can manage before the stars start to blur, the ISO setting for a right-loaded histogram would be 3200. But the stars are tiny, and the histogram might not be finding the brightest ones, or they might not make a big enough bump to see. Set the ISO to 500.
Now let’s move on to a slightly different situation, one in which you are not trying to get the settings for a single exposure or a set of exposures of the same subject in the same light, but a situation in which you want camera settings that will work over a modest range of lighting and camera angle changes. This is a situation in which your first instinct might be to use one of the GFX 100S automatic exposure modes. However, you will see that there can be advantages to setting the camera’s exposure manually.
For your anticipated typical shot, use the techniques above to decide your settings. Then decide how much the scene and lighting is likely to change, and in what direction. If you think it will get brighter, bias the settings you came up with for highlight protection. If darker conditions are more likely, make the bias in favor of shadow SNR. The advantages of this approach over A, S, or P modes are:
- You get the shutter speed you need to deal with the motion, and no faster.
- You get the aperture you need to deal with DOF, and no narrower.
- You don’t have to try to figure out what the heck the metering system is doing to your exposures.
- You’ve got an ISO setting that does what you want it to do, even as conditions change.
This way of exposing is quite different than the way that most folks use, and is fluid and freeing in practice, removing worries about exposure and producing optimal files.
What if you’re in a fluid situation and want to use aperture priority exposure mode?
The cardinal rule remains the same: If you can, expose to the right (ETTR) at base ISO. With the GFX 100, you can use the live view histogram, or take shot and look at the histogram as you review the capture. Set your exposure compensation (EC) so that your meter will give you that exposure. You might want to bias the exposure slightly towards underexposure if the light is changing since it’s easier to deal with a bit more noise in the shadows than blown highlights.
But let’s ask what you should do if the ETTR exposure is too long for you or requires a wider lens opening than you want to use. If the lens opening is the most important thing to you:
- Set the ISO to base ISO
- Set the camera to aperture-priority exposure mode
- Set the aperture to whatever you wish
- If the ETTR exposure is acceptable, you’re done; take the shot
- If the shutter speed is too long, and you want some extra highlight protection, crank the EC down (make the numbers more negative) until you get an acceptable shutter speed.
- Stop when you get to two stops underexposed from the ETTR setting.
- If that gets you an acceptable shutter speed, you’re done; take the shot.
- If not, set the ISO to 500
- If the exposure is acceptable, you’re done; take the shot.
- If the shutter speed is too long, and you want some extra highlight protection, crank the EC down (make the numbers more negative) until you get an acceptable shutter speed.
- Stop when you get to three stops underexposed.
- If that’s still a short enough exposure, increase ISO until you get a shutter speed you can live with, keeping the EC three stops underexposed.
Sounds like a lot of fiddling, but after you’ve painstakingly followed the steps above a few times, you’ll get a feel for it and will be able to take many shortcuts. The idea is to make use of the highlight protection that comes with what would generally be called underexposure, and boost the gain in postproduction, which, thanks to the nature of the GFX 100S sensor, has practically no noise penalty.
If the shutter speed is what’s key for you, use the above procedure, but set the camera to S mode and swap aperture and shutter speed in the protocol.
You will be fiddling with the EC dial in the GFX 100S a lot if you use this procedure. It would be nice if the GFX 100S had a dedicated EC knob right on top of the camera, like the GFX 50R. So you’ll have to learn to push the EC button and twiddle the command dial to change EC.
Christer Almqvist says
Jim,
I like your write-up. I work as you propose, but my approach is a bit simpler.
My Sony A7R3 has three programable setting which I have set up based on the following premises:
– highlight protection is more important than full shadow detail, if I need to choose.
– f-stop is based on DOF required; shutter speed on need to avoid blur.
– ISO is generally what follows, but A and S may be adjusted if ISO gets too extreme.
Consequently my programable settings (with exposure compensation generally set at -1) are.:
#1 is A with ISO set at 100, this is for bright light or tripod work
#2 is A with ISO auto and S preset 1/125 (I’m not a sports photographer.)
#3 is M with ISO auto, except for TTL flash.
Brian Olson says
Great write up. Makes sense. As you noticed in your other blog entry, the dr200 and dr400 settings effectively under expose by dropping ISO and set an exif parameter that causes exposure to be raised in post. I wish the auto iso function operated more closely to what you’ve described in this write up and respected the shift at ISO 500 as your instructions do. Any thoughts on why they don’t implement something like you described as the auto ISO function? They could even adjust the exif parameter to cause it to be raised up to three stops in post. DR-auto is a 1 stop version of it I guess.
Garry says
Jim
You logic is very similar to the one I use, although I don’t have a GFX ;-).
The only nuance, assuming I am not exposure bracketing, is that I may take an additional multi image capture set for the shadows, ie say, 9 images in total.
These 9 images allow me to ‘extend’ the dynamic range in the shadows, ie by 3Ev if I have 9 images.
Plus, relative to exposure bracketing, post processing 9 equal exposures is simple, ie using smart object stats or a photoshop script I have to adjust layer opacity. Also, if there is wind motion, the resultant processed image set creates a rather natural/organic looking image.
I then simply use layers to mask/blend in the clean shadow detail from image set, ie she I need too.
JimK says
If you’re doing exposure bracketing, I don’t think my strategy makes sense at all. Just make sure you’ve got enough exposures to get the shadow detail you want in one, and have one where the highlights aren’t clipped.
Garry says
Jim
I thought I was clear, that I’m not exposure bracketing 😉
I’m simply taking an additional set of images at the base exposure, to extend the DR in post processing.
Taking an additional n images is a useful insurance strategy, ie to get more useable shadows when ETTRing.
Works for me for some scenes.
JimK says
Oh, I see. That works. But you’ll not get the advantage of lower read noise in the shadows if your base exposure is at an ISO setting that doesn’t increase the conversion gain.
Garry says
Jim
I think I understand what you are saying, but surely averaging will reduce the shot noise in the shadows, and, in fact, everywhere.
JimK says
WRT shot noise, I agree with you. I was thinking about read noise.
Garry says
Jim
No, I’m not doing exposure bracketing.
The only difference between your workflow and mine is, I’ll sometimes throw in a multi image capture set, ie for post processing for higher quality shadows, ie averaging.
Garry says
Sorry postings crossed
Brian Olson says
I appreciate you providing this method, it makes sense and I use it. I’ve also tried going completely “ISOless” by sticking with just 100 and 500, but it’s pretty impractical with the post processing tools having a limited exposure adjustment and having to either turn off exposure preview which also messes with the histogram, or deal with a nearly black LCD.
I wish they had not chosen to provide an ISO dial and instead provided a “Lux” dial. It would still be manual exposure with no measurement by the camera, but I would set the LUX dial to the amount of lux I want for mid gray (always displayed as mid gray on the LCD), set shutter speed and aperture to required values and the camera would compute the gain required to put that LUX value at mid gray in the ADC (3 stops from full scale). Then I could easily keep the exposure constant while adjusting shutter/aperture. As it is, I have to constantly wheel ISO to invert changes to shutter and aperture and maintain a constant (already correct) exposure. Gain should have been a computed value, not a control. If the shot is too slow, change shutter, too shallow, change aperture, too dark, change Lux. For a bonus give me a “headroom” dial that shifts mid gray between -3 stops FS and -5. I’ll wheel that until the blinking highlights stop, preferably while mid gray stays mid gray. Then every thing would be nice and independent. I wouldn’t be trying to frame a way too dark image in the LCD to save the highlights.
Dan says
Is a similar exposure technique useful on the Z9? Apologies for asking an over-simplified question…
JimK says
Yes. The Z9 changes to high conversion gain at ISO 500.
Mike MacDonald says
Jim,
In your steps, when moving up to ISO 500 from ISO 100 (after reaching a 2-stop underexposure from ETTR), should I then turn the EC back to ZERO?
Thanks!
Mike
JimK says
Look at the histogram to figure out where to put the EC control. The right place to put it will depend on the scene. You want to maximize the exposure without clipping important highlights.