• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / Sheen and specular surfaces with Fuji pixel shift on the GFX 100

Sheen and specular surfaces with Fuji pixel shift on the GFX 100

April 22, 2021 JimK Leave a Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX 100S. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 100S”.

I had a reader reaction to this post about the Fujifilm Pixel Shift feature on the GFX 100S.

…specular surfaces and sheen surfaces and a lot more are all but impossible to shoot, from the samples I’ve seen.   The defects won’t show up on the type of stuff you showed in your post.

I decided to give that a try. This time, I used a GFX 100 with the current firmware, 3.01 (Version 4 is due out RSN). I also used both the version of Fujifilm Pixel Shift combiner I used before, version 1.1, and the one that just came out today, version 1.2.

I lit the subject with a single Aputure 300 LED light with a 24-inch parabolic reflector and a diffuser. I used the Fuji 120 mm f/4 macro lens, and mounted the camera on a C1 cube and then to a Foba camera stand. I set the self timer to 10 seconds, and got out of the room for the exposures, so that my moving reflection wouldn’t create artifacts. I backed off on the exposure a lot to keep from blowing out to many of the highlights, and gave al the images a 3.9 stop exposure push in Lightroom. White balance was to the black velvet in the single-shot image, and was copied to the other images. Sharpening was amount = 20, radius = 1, detail = 25 for the single shot image, and amount = 20, radius = 2, detail = 25 for the pixel-shifted images, which gives the same sharpening on a per-picture basis.

The scene:

Single shot

 

Pixel Shift Combiner v 1.1

 

Pixel  Shift Combiner v 1.2

 

Now we’ll take a close look (about 1:1 for the pixel shifted images, and 200% for the single shot) at some of the areas where we might expect to find problems based on the quote above.

First, an area where the light source is reflected, but is not blown out:

Single shot

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.1

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.2

 

The single shot image is substantially noiser. The color balance of the v 1.2 combined image is closer to the single shot. I don’t see any artifacts.

Now an area where there is a subtle rolloff of the specular highlight, and some evidence of chromatic aberration in the lens.

 

Single shot

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.1

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.2

 

Again the pixel shifted images have substantially lower noise.  I see no artifacts.

Here’s an area where the highlights are close to, but not quite, blown:

Single shot

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.1

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.2

I think the pixel shifted shots are as good as one can expect for this kind on scene.

And last, an area that is well and truly blown:

Single shot

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.1

 

PixelShift Combiner v 1.2

 

This looks fine to me, too.

This is not the kind of subject for which pixel shift offers much improvement, aside from the noise reduction due to averaging.

 

GFX 100, GFX 100S

← Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S Fujifilm Pixel Shift Combiner Accurate Color mode →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • Štěpán Kaňa on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Štěpán Kaňa on How Sensor Noise Scales with Exposure Time
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • JimK on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Geofrey on Calculating reach for wildlife photography
  • Javier Sanchez on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?
  • Mike MacDonald on Your photograph looks like a painting?

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.