• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 100 / FF equivalent focal lengths of Hasselblad XCD, Fuji GF lenses

FF equivalent focal lengths of Hasselblad XCD, Fuji GF lenses

November 23, 2022 JimK 7 Comments

The question of equivalent full frame focal lengths of the Fujifilm GF and Hasselblad XCD lenses comes up over and over. I thought I’d post that information here, and then I can link to it when the topic comes up again.

There are three common ways to calculate equivalent focal lengths: by sensor width, by sensor height, and by sensor diagonal.  The equivalent FF focal length has the same angle of view as the MF sensor in that direction. It is conventional to assume the camera is held in landscape orientation for this calculation.

The primes:

 

 

The zooms, with both ends of the range calculated:

 

GFX 100, GFX 100S, GFX 50S, X2D

← Hasselblad X2D long exposures versus averaging Swebo TC-1 OOBE →

Comments

  1. Haitong Yu says

    November 23, 2022 at 6:15 pm

    For Hasselblad lenses, you can refer to their datasheets for even more accurate FLs. I remember the actually FL for XCD21 is 21.8mm, so it is more like 17mm diagonally.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      November 23, 2022 at 7:30 pm

      What makes you think their calculations are more accurate than mine?

      Please link to their specifications of focal lengths that are different from those engraved on the lenses.

      Reply
      • Steven says

        September 28, 2023 at 8:12 am

        https://cdn.hasselblad.com/datasheets/xcd-lenses/XCD21-Datasheet-en.pdf

        https://cdn.hasselblad.com/76a0253f-3df6-49d6-b37c-1934c22a4710_xcd21+datasheet+uk+180420.pdf

        “Focal length 21,8 mm”

        “Equivalent Focal length (24×36) 17 mm”

        Reply
        • Dimitri says

          January 7, 2024 at 9:42 am

          Hasselblad is actually wrong. They don’t take into account the aspect ratio 4:3 of their sensor 44×33.

          21.8mm is equivalent in reality to 15.8mm when you take aspect ratio into account.

          See my comment below about the maths.

          Reply
  2. Dimitri says

    January 7, 2024 at 9:37 am

    I would like to share my maths if some people want to learn.

    When comparing FF and 44×33, spect ratio should be taken into the account, since GFX is 4:3 and FF is 3:2. Shooting with 4:3 will not yield same focal lenght as shooting at 3:2.

    Let me demonstrate the math:
    First we have to convert full frame to 4:3 aspect ratio to match GFX 44×33 aspect ratio and thus compare apple to apples.

    Cropped 4:3 full frame is 32×24 (previously 36×24) : 32^2 + 24^2 = 1600
    Root of 1600 = 40
    Full rame 3:2 will be 43.27 (calcuation :36^2+24^2=1872, root of 1872=43.27)

    ( Full frame 3:2) 43.27 / (cropped 4:3 FF) 40 = 1.08 (cropped ff 4:3 to true ff)

    GFX 4:3:
    44^2+33^2=3025
    Root of 3025 = 55

    Let’s compare gfx to cropped 4:3 ff:
    40/55 = 0.727 (full number is 0.72727273 = ~0.73) crop factor of GFX to a cropped 4:3 full frame is 0.73

    Here we go 0.727 is the crop factor of GFX to full frame, taking into account aspect ration, and representing a real crop factor.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 7, 2024 at 9:59 am

      It’s a lot simpler to say the crop factor is 24/33 = 0.7272727

      Reply
      • Dimitri says

        January 7, 2024 at 12:26 pm

        Thank you !! I took the hardest route.

        And big thanks for your work on that excel sheet with focal lenght. It’s so in depth!

        Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.