the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / X2D / Hasselblad X2D long exposures versus averaging

Hasselblad X2D long exposures versus averaging

November 21, 2022 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the 39th in a series of posts on the Hasselblad X2D 100C camera and the XCD lenses. You will be able to find all the posts in this series by looking at the righthand column on this page and finding the Category “X2D”.

In the last two posts I looked at the X2D shadow performance with 17-minute exposures at base ISO. I did this because a couple of people who like the long-exposure look asked me about it. But there’s a better way to get that blurring effect if you want to minimize noise in the shadows: make a series of exposures with shorter exposures and average them in Photoshop or some other image editor.

This post is intended to demonstrate that.

The camera was mounted to the Foba camera stand with an Arca Swiss C1 cube. The rest of the setup is as follows:

  • X2D with 38 mm f/2.5 XCD lens, ISO 64, about 10 feet from target
  • Single exposure with shutter speed 17 minutes
  • 34 exposures with shutter speed 32 seconds with no delay between the images, using the built-in intervalometer
  • Manual focusing
  • Breakthrough 10-stop neutral density filter.
  • 2 second self timer
  • Aputure 100 LED light, with diffuser

In Lightroom, for the 17-minute exposure, I gave the image a 4.75 stop exposure push, white balanced to the second gray patch from the left on the Macbeth CC24, turned off sharpening and noise reduction. I used the Camera Standard profile.

For the 32-second exposures, with the same profile, I gave the image a 4.75 stop exposure push, white balanced to the second gray patch from the left on the Macbeth CC24, turned off sharpening and noise reduction, exported to Photoshop as layers, selected all the layers, converted them to smart objects, set the stacking mode to mean, and flattened the result.

Here are some crops at 100% magnification:

X2D, 17 minutes, Lightroom development

 

X2D, 34 images, ISO 64, 32 sec, f/5.6 mean

 

X2D, Lightroom development, 17 minutes

 

X2D, 34 images, ISO 64, 32 sec, f/5.6 mean

The reduction in noise is striking. Using this technique also means that, all else equal, you need 5 stops less attenuation for your neutral density filter, increasing the chances that the colors won’t be shifted much by the filter. I have found in the past that with an intervalometer and no extra delay between the exposures, that stacking 30-second exposures gives the same visual appearance (except of the noise) as making one long exposure, even with subjects like star trails.

 

X2D

← Hasselblad X2D, GFX 100S long-exposure noise, 4.75 stop pushes FF equivalent focal lengths of Hasselblad XCD, Fuji GF lenses →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • Stefan on Swebo TC-1 OOBE
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.