• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Leica Q2 Monochrom / Leica Q2 has a real raw histogram

Leica Q2 has a real raw histogram

May 15, 2022 JimK 4 Comments

This is the fourth post in a series about the Leica Q2 Monochrom. You can see all the other posts in the series by looking in the Category List drop-down menu on the right side of the page.

The Q2 Monochrom doesn’t have to do any color transforms to create the JPEG preview image. So clipping on the sensor should translate directly to clipping in the live histogram. There are lots of “shoulds” in photography that don’t turn out to actually happen, so I thought I’d check. I lined up an image with a specular highlight and adjusted the aperture so that the live histogram was just short of clipping. Then I brought the image into RawDigger, and took a look at the raw histogram:

That’s great! The clipping represented in the EVF and on the LCD represents the clipping — or in this case, the lack of clipping — in the raw file. The live view blinkies actuvate at the same point in the image tone curve where the finder histogram begins to clip.

If you’re used to having some wiggle room when the camera says the right side of the histogram is close to clipping, that ain’t happening with this camera. For those of you who are precise, that’s no big deal. For those who play a bit faster and looser than that, you might want to leave yourself a safety margin.

If you use the blinkies in playback mode to see if you’ve clipped the raw file, the camera is overly conservative. The above file makes the camera flash the light area under the tripod head, even though it is not clipped. Oh, well, you can’t win them all.

I was asked by a reader to look at how the preview histogram changed with the JPEG toning settings. I am happy to report that there is minimal, if any, change to the histogram near the clipping point.

Leica Q2 Monochrom

← Leica Q2 Monochrom vs GFX 50S — red Siemens star Leica Q2 Monochrom dark-field ISO series →

Comments

  1. Srdjan says

    May 15, 2022 at 11:34 pm

    Q2M owners have reported (Leica Camera Forum) that the histogram changes with the JPG settings. This would indicate that the histogram is not a raw histogram.
    What are your JPG settings, and have you noticed that histogram changes with JPG settings?

    Reply
    • JimK says

      May 16, 2022 at 6:34 am

      If the signal processing chain works the way it does in most MILCs, the JPEG processing does affect the histogram. I was using the default settings. I will do some further checking. Thanks for pointing that out.

      Reply
    • JimK says

      May 16, 2022 at 8:43 am

      “…have you noticed that histogram changes with JPG settings?”

      The clipping point indicated by the preview histogram does not appear to change with the toning setting.

      Reply
  2. Greg Johnson says

    June 6, 2022 at 5:48 am

    Very interesting. We have dreamed of a real in-camera raw histo since the dawn of time. I would imagine that since we are viewing a jpeg in the EVF that fiddling with those settings would have some impact. But with the mono, maybe it is minimal (like you said) and we have close to a real raw readout on the histo while shooting.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.