the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / Leica Q2 Monochrom / Leica Q2 Monochrom dark-field ISO series

Leica Q2 Monochrom dark-field ISO series

May 16, 2022 JimK Leave a Comment

This is the fifth post in a series about the Leica Q2 Monochrom. You can see all the other posts in the series by looking in the Category List drop-down menu on the right side of the page.

 

You can learn a lot about a camera with the lenscap on. I made a series of images of the back of a Thumbs-Up Q2 lenscap, under the following conditions:

  • ISOs 100 through 100000, in 1-stop steps
  • 1/800 second shutter speed
  • f/16
  • Automatic shutter
  • Lens focused on infinity
  • 24 degrees C ambient
  • DNG recording

 

I looked at the raw histograms with RawDigger.

The Q2 uses a 14-bit analog to digital converter (ADC). The black point is about 512. The histogram is misshaped. There are two unpopulated buckets right in the middle of what should be a Gaussian distribution. The distribution observed here is asymmetrical. This kind of behavior could cause the “green shadows problem” observed with the Leica M240 if the camera were a normal Bayer-CFA one, but I think the only effect here will be to raise the black point a bit and reduce noise at low ISOs, sacrificing a bit of shadow detail.

At ISO 200, the distribution is more symmetrical, and there’s more noise. The dropouts are still there.

The noise is worse at ISO 400, as you’d expect.

I changed the horizontal scale for this and the next few shots. This is a credible histogram, except for the dropouts.

This follows the pattern that we’re seeing in this series.

So does this, but the histogram is starting to get ragged.

I’ve changed the scale again. There is some combing visible. Possibly there’s some noise reduction processing taking place.

Now there a lot of combing in the vicinity of the black point. I don’t like to see that.

Again, a change of scale. Now, in addition to the combing near the black point, there is a cutoff at high counts. I’m surprised to see that. Could it be an issue with RawDigger?

Pretty gnarly.

Ugh.

I think I’ll look at the frequency domain to try and see what kind of processing Leica is doing at high ISO settings.

 

Leica Q2 Monochrom

← Leica Q2 has a real raw histogram Gamut of 2 more basis-function derived metamer sets →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Jake on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time
  • Piotr Chylarecki on Who am I?
  • JimK on Who am I?

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.