• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Leica Q2 Monochrom / Two ways to improve the Q2 handling

Two ways to improve the Q2 handling

May 22, 2022 JimK 4 Comments

This is the eleventh post in a series about the Leica Q2 Monochrom. You can see all the other posts in the series by looking in the Category List drop-down menu on the right side of the page.

I’ve always been a fan of the Thumbs-Up hotshoe-mounted grips for the Leica M cameras. I used them on my — now departed — M8, M9,  and M240 cameras. They increase the stability and precision of handholding the cameras. Leica, seeing the advantages of such an approach, make a similar grip for the Q2 and Q2 Monochrom.

Leica doesn’t make it easy to get a quick release tripod plate on the Q2. If you put on a generic plate, it will obscure the battery door, the flash card door, or both. RRS makes an L-bracket grip for the Q2 that allows access to both doors on the bottom of the camera, and provides a right-handed grip, too. It is a one piece unit, so you can’t take the vertical part of the L-bracket off. In order to leave clearance for the access to the two doors on the bottom of the camera, RRS had to forgo finding a plate in the bracket to stow an Allen wrench, so you’ll have to leave it attached in the field, or carry the right wrench in your bag.

It is possible to use both at the same time. In fact, in some ways the two are better together than they are apart. The hotshoe bracket weighs next to nothing, so you can leave it attached whenever you don’t need to use another hotshoe-mounted device.

Some pictures, with explanations.

The thumb rest mounts into the hot shoe, extends all the way to the finder, and has a button extension for the button it covers up.

 

A look at the thumb rest from the back. Your thumb goes on the part with the specular reflection.

 

You can see the thumb rest at the bottom of this image, and the RRS grip at the top.

 

A side view of the RRS grip

 

The RRS grip from the front

 

A look at the left end of the RRS plate. This portion is not removable.

 

The RRS plate viewed from the bottom. You a can see why there’s no room for a built-in Allen wrench. There is a QR hole at the top center of the picture, but I don’t anticipate using a QR strap with this camera.

It is difficult for me to extract the SD card, because of interference from the RRS plate, but I have fairly large hands.

 

 

 

Leica Q2 Monochrom

← Leica Q2 Monochrom highlight linearity at ISO 100 Leica Q2 Monochrom pros and cons →

Comments

  1. tom says

    May 23, 2022 at 7:08 am

    absurd. totally wrong. a camera with such a price premium has to be “tuned” to become manageable… and how stupid: why don’t the german “engineers” do not provide that stuff… of course: as serial accessories “…

    i know, why i left Leica years ago … “low engineering incompetence causing affluence”

    the same with many of their newer lenses

    correct me if i’m wrong

    Reply
    • JimK says

      May 23, 2022 at 7:12 am

      You are entitled to your opinion. I don’t agree with you, but from the tone of your comment, nothing that I say is likely to change your mind.

      Reply
  2. Gregory Johnson says

    June 4, 2022 at 5:48 am

    Jim, I used the Q2 for 2 years with nothing added. I would just awkwardly screw on an arca plate when I took the rare tripod shot and use my smallest RRS travel tripod. For vertical I would just flip the camera sideways into portrait, which is always a bit sloppy.
    But a week before my 6 weeks Leica Q2-only shoot in Sicily, I ordered the RRS L Bracket and like you said, it has a nice little added grip and the bottom rail has cutouts for the SD card and battery. The SD card is a little hard to get out through the tight opening with your two fingers, but no real problem. I love the feel of the Q2 with that added grip, and the L Plate adds some protection. It looks pretty good too, but changes the form enough to cause may Q2-lovers to decry it as blasphemy. The Q2 is a beautiful camera and any camera that small s going to be a little awkward for a guy with big hands. I always shot the Q2 with kind of a fingertip grip. Now with the RRS L-Bracket, I have a real grip that kind of slides onto your right hand and fingers.
    I had a thumb-up hot shoe mount for all of my little-bitty Fuji x100 cameras and loved it. Never really thought about it for the Q2. I need to try it.

    Reply
  3. lancej says

    March 25, 2023 at 9:25 am

    I own a Q2 with their OEM handgrip and love it. For those few times when I use this on a tripod a generic Swiss arca plate [$40] works fine. Yes it covers up the battery and card holder but how much time and effort [15 seconds to undo and 15 more to put it back on ] and replace whatever you need,.Thereby saving you $225 US from buying RRS version of it. Nothing against RRS they make great kit but you may not always need it.
    Granted given were talking Leica’s price is usually not the barrier for accessories. Yes people will say ”well I will miss shots then,” which I would reply if you need to change your card or battery quicker than 30 seconds your probably using the wrong camera, it is not for sports, birds and action shots .
    This conversation happens on all gear sites the debate is in full bloom on L plates for Nikon z 9’s my advice is to have an empty card and fully charged battery and you won’t panic to have to change it when you see an eagle with a salmon in it’s mouth riding on the back of a killer whale .:-]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.