the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / Nikon Z6/Z7 fake ISOs, part 2

Nikon Z6/Z7 fake ISOs, part 2

March 4, 2019 By JimK Leave a Comment

Yesterday I posted about the Nikon Z6 and Z7 fake ISOs. This is a post for those who are skeptical that the camera really works that way.

Here’s how to demonstrate that the ISO’s below base ISO are fake for raw files.

Put your camera on a tripod.

Point it at something that isn’t going to move much.

Set the camera to manual.

Pick an exposure that’s not going to clip highlights.

Make four shots at that exposure, at base ISO and the next three ISOs down from that.

Look at the statistics in the raw file inspector of your choice. I used RawDigger for the screen shots below. Ignore the max and min, since they are not repeatable from shot to shot. Just look at the averages and the standard deviations.

 

 

 

They are virtually the same.

QED.

That test showed that the camera doesn’t change sensitivity when the ISO setting is dropped below base ISO. This next one will show that the camera meters as if the camera became less sensitive.

Put your camera on a tripod.

Point it at something that isn’t going to move much.

Set the camera to aperture priority.

Pick an exposure compensation that’s at least one stop under one that will just barely not clip highlights.

Make four shots at that setting, at base ISO and the next three ISOs down from that.

Look at the statistics in the raw file inspector of your choice as before.

 

 

 

 

Note how the average counts increase with each step down in ISO setting, and that the ISO 50 counts are about double those at ISO 100. The meter operates as if the camera sensitivity does change. Since it doesn’t really change, the ISO portion of exposure reciprocity fails.

← Nikon Z6/Z7 Fake ISOs Nikon Z6/Z7 fake ISOs, part 3 →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

April 2021
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
« Mar    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Pixel shift with the Fujifilm GFX 100S
  • Ilya Zakharevich on Relative sensitivity of Sony a7RIV and GFX 100S
  • JimK on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • John Leathwick on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • Christer Almqvist on GFX 100S sensor is a 4-shot stitch
  • JimK on Three dimensionality and sensor format
  • Tom Hegeman on Three dimensionality and sensor format
  • Bjoern on Three dimensionality and sensor format
  • JimK on Shutter shock in the GFX 100s

Archives

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.