• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / Nikon Z7 scan time and exposure variation in EFCS and MS

Nikon Z7 scan time and exposure variation in EFCS and MS

January 14, 2022 JimK 3 Comments

I’ve done a lot of work on the way that electronic first curtain shutter (EFCS) works on the Sony a7x cameras, but I never did much with the EFCS in the Nikon Z-series cameras, except to measure how well the did at reducing vibration and the associated image sharpness. The reason was that I somehow had gotten the idea that all EFCS systems in MILCs were about the same. A discussion with a DPR member make me question that assumption, and I took a look.

The tools I used were the same tools that I had used with the Sony cameras: a Tek analog oscilloscope (this won’t work with a digital one) and a Wavetek function generator. I set the Wavetek to a high frequency triangle wave so I’d have lots of traces that spanned the vertical extent of the scope. I set the x-axis timebase to 1 millisecond per division. I mounted a CV 125mm f/2.5 Apo-Lanthar on a Z7, and focused it on the scope face.

I first tested the mechanical shutter, with the shutter speed set to 1/2000 second.

 

MS, 1/2000

Earlier time is on the left. Later time is on the right. You can see that the Nikon exposes the image from the bottom to the top (because the image is reversed on the sensor, that means the shutter travels from the top of the camera to the bottom). You can also see that the shutter speeds up as it travels across the sensor. Both curtains speed up at the same rate, so the exposure is even.

You can see that the exposure is about half a division. Half a division is half a millisecond. The shutter speed was set to 1/2000 second. 1/2000 second is half a millisecond.

You can also see how long both curtains take to travel across the sensor, if you mentally extend the green areas at the bottom of the image to the edge of the image. It’s 3 divisions. Three divisions is  3 milliseconds. The synch speed of the Z7 is 1/200 seconds. That’s five milliseconds. That means, if the planets align, you’ll be able to use the Z7 at max synch speed with strobes of up to 2 millisecond duration.

 

MS, 1/1000

At 1/1000 second, not much changes except that the slit gets wider, so that each parto fthe sensor is exposed for 1 millisecond, or 1/1000 second.

Going back to 1/2000 second, and turning on EFCS, here’s what we see.

EFCS, 1/2000

The second curtain, which is the mechanical shutter curtain, still takes 4 msec to make its way across the sensor, and it still starts slow and speeds up as it goes. But the first curtain, which is the electronic one, marches along at a constant pace, so that the exposure is shorter at the bottom of the image than at the top by almost 500 microseconds.

Sony has this problem to a smaller extent, because they come close to replicating the speeding up of the second curtain by speeding up the first, electronic, one.

Setting the shutter speed to 1/1000 second makes the issue less severe:

EFCS, 1/1000

Toward the bottom, the exposure is close to 1/2000 second, and at the top, it’s 1/1000 second.

Slowing the shutter down even more:

EFCS 1/500

It’s 1/500 at the top, and a bit less than that at the bottom.

EFCS , 1/250

At 1/250, the problem essentially disappears.

Nikon limits the maximum shutter speed in EFCS mode to 1/2000 second. Sony doesn’t limit theirs, but cautions against high shutter speeds with EFCS. Sony’s compensation in the EFCS ‘ballistics” is one of the reasons why. The other is that the Sony shutter travels in the opposite direction and it’s often better to have the image a bit dark at the top than at the bottom.

Nikon Z6/7

← Nikon D5 and Z7 sensitivity More on Nikon Z7 EFCS exposure variation →

Comments

  1. CarVac says

    January 14, 2022 at 4:03 pm

    Is this lens electronically communicating with the camera?

    The camera needs to know the lens’s exit pupil distance in order to properly set the timing/speed offset for the EFCS.

    On my Canon 60D, very short exit pupil distances (my Tessar 45/2.8) have one edge of the frame darker and very long exit pupil distances (my Sonnar 135/2.8) have the opposite edge darker when I use 1/8000, indicating that the camera assumes some sort of happy medium exit pupil distance when it doesn’t have a native lens mounted.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      January 14, 2022 at 4:11 pm

      The lens is dumb. No electronic communication. I take your point. Do you know if Nikon changes the EFCS timing with different lenses?

      Reply
    • JimK says

      January 14, 2022 at 4:13 pm

      Does your Canon EFCS match the trailing curtain ballistics with the rolling reset?

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.