• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Nikon Z6/7 / Z7/FTZ AF fine-tuning

Z7/FTZ AF fine-tuning

November 9, 2018 JimK 1 Comment

This is one in a series of posts on the Nikon Z7. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “Nikon Z6/7”.

In the previous post I started out testing the Z7 for autofocusing accuracy in various focusing modes, but discovered my testing wasn’t valid because I was assuming that there was a CDAF trim step after the cameras PDAF focusing, and it appeared that either that wasn’t happening at all, or it wasn’t very effective.

That caused me to think about the PDAF fine-tuning function in the Z7. I’d figured that it wouldn’t affect accuracy, just speed, in that it would allow the hare-like PDAF phase of the autofocusing to get closer to the correct location so that the tortoise-equivalent CDAF phase would go faster.

But what if there isn’t a CDAF phase, at least with adapted lenses? Then the PDAF fine tuning would affect accuracy, not speed.

I put the 105 mm f/1.4 lens on a Z7, set it up a bit under three meters from my checkerboard ramp, and made 16 exposures in AF-S Single mode with AF fine tuning set to -20, -10, 0, +10, and +20. I racked the lens towards the far on the odd exposures, and in the near direction on the odd ones. I analyzed all the data, and here’s what I saw:

AF fine-tuning does affect accuracy. It affects it in just about the same way as in the D850, with each step changing the image-field focal plane by about 4 micrometers. In the above chart, negative numbers on the y-axis mean object-field focus shift away from the camera. This is the opposite of the usual way I do things. I apologize for the inconsistency.

In Pinpoint mode, which uses CDAF instead of PDAF, the results are similar except for lower scatter:

It’s going to take a while to digest the implications of this.

Nikon Z6/7

← Z7 w/ 105/1.4 static focus errors in various AF modes Z7 with 105/1.4 focus shift, pinpoint and single AF accuracy →

Comments

  1. Brian says

    November 12, 2018 at 5:57 am

    It has been said that most F-mount lenses are not designed for fast CDAF focusing. I would not be surprised if the camera skipped the CDAF step altogether when using adapted lenses. This would allow adapted lenses to focus with similar speed to what they do on DSLRs. It would be interesting to run this series of tests again with a native lens and also an adapted AF-P lens.

    Thanks for all the work you are doing with the Z cameras!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.