• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Technical / Focusing, part 2

Focusing, part 2

February 12, 2011 JimK 1 Comment

Where was I before I got distracted by all that resampling stuff? Oh, I remember: focusing.

The first thing to do about focusing is to find out if the focusing aids in your camera are doing their job. Whenever I’d get a new autofocus lens, I used to take a newspaper, open it to a page with mostly text, make a pen mark on it about halfway across, spread it out on the ground, lie down on my stomach and aim the camera obliquely across the newspaper aiming the focusing point at the pen mark, and take a picture with the aperture wide open. Most of the time, but certainly not all the time, the pen mark was in the center of the plane of focus. Sometimes, the sharpest part of the image was in front of or (less often) behind the pen mark. When that happened, I’d go into the camera’s AF compensation setup screens and fiddle with compensation settings until the pen mark was indeed in focus on retests. I’d do that with every camera body on which I planned to use that lens.

Now I use this device:

_3S22682

It’s called LensAlign Pro. It’ll cost you $180, which is really expensive considering how simple it is. You can buy the plain old LensAlign for $80, or the Datacolor DC SLC100 SpyderLensCal for less than sixty bucks. I haven’t tested the last two, but I suspect they’ll all do the job pretty well.

Here’s an example of what things should look like, using a Nikon 35mm f/1.4 lens on a D3s:

D3s-35

You can use the same setup to test the accuracy of the rangefinder/lens combination on a Leica. Here’s what you get with a 50mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH on an M9 when both are almost perfectly set up (I say almost because of the tiny bit of front focus present):

M9-50

And here’s what it looks like when there’s severe front focusing using a Zeiss 35mm f/2 Biogon (in all other respects a good performer) on the same body:

M9-35

Note that the Leica pictures are a bit sharper. That’s partially because of the greater resolution of the M9 over the D3s, but mostly due to the lack of an anti-aliasing filter on the Leica. You can also see the downside of omitting the AA filter: there’s definite spurious color in the sharp parts of the Leica images.

Caveats and limitations

With autofocus, it’s possible that errors can vary with focusing distance; with rangefinder cameras, it’s more likely. Therefore, you should do the checking at distances approximating those at which you will be using the camera. This means that, for wide angle lenses, the target may not occupy much of the visual field of the lens. Pick a distance that gives enough resolution of the target to judge the accuracy of the focus. With lenses of long focal length, that’s not usually a problem.

With extreme wide angle lenses, you will probably find out that, at reasonable working distances, that there’s so much depth of field, even with the lens wide open, that the whole target is sharp and you can’t evaluate focus accuracy. If you want to see exactly what’s going on, there’s a longer ruler available as an option to the LensAlign Pro, but I suggest that you just don’t worry; that means that your focusing accuracy is good enough. Here’s an example with an 18mm f/3.8 Super Elmar, with lots of Bayer pattern aliasing:

M9-18

You should do several tests with each lens and look at all the results with an eye to evaluating the AF consistency for AF lenses, and your consistency for manual focus. There is likely to be more slop in the latter than the former.  Putting your camera on a tripod and doing the testing in dim light may yield worse results for both automatic and manual focusing.

What to do if you find problems with your hardware

With Canon and Nikon high end SLRs, you can make a correction in each body for systematic errors with any particular lens, and, when that lens is mounted again, the camera will remember the correction.

With other cameras, the Leica rangefinders being examples, if you find that all lenses exhibit focus errors in the same direction, it’s probably a problem with your body. If you send the body in, the error can probably be corrected.

If you have a lens like my Zeiss 35mm Biogon that focuses in the wrong place on a body that produces good results with other lenses, you can send that lens in for repair, or learn to compensate for the errors.

Next up: achieving accurate focus with cameras and lenses that are properly adjusted.

Technical

← More images in COLOR Magazine Focusing, part 3 →

Trackbacks

  1. Wag the dog, part 6 | The Last Word says:
    July 10, 2011 at 9:29 am

    […] I can unravel the mystery of the way-to-close-focusing 35mm Zeiss f/2 Biogon that I noticed in this post.  When installed on the NEX-5 via the Novaflex adapter, the Zeiss lens focuses to infinity when […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.