the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

  • site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge
You are here: Home / Technical / Getting more RAM, part 1

Getting more RAM, part 1

March 2, 2011 JimK 1 Comment

In 1955, C. Northcote Parkinson proclaimed an adage, which is now stated: work expands to fill the time available for its completion. Parkinson ’s Law has many corollaries. I have recently run into one: computer memory usage expands to fill the available RAM. Two years ago, I upgraded my computer hardware to gain more memory, going from 4 GB to 16 GB of RAM. At first, sixteen gigs seemed like a vast expanse of storage, but as I started doing more composites, it began to feel constricting. I am now doing 3000×20000 pixel images with as many as forty layers, and I need more memory.

My current image editing machine, a Dell T3400, is not expandable beyond 16 GB, so I need a new computer. I would like to go to 48 GB. I would also like one six-core processor. There are two reasons for not wanting a dual-processor machine, Photoshop doesn’t use more than two or three cores well for most operations, and the ac power required to supply a second processor can be more than 150 watts. I want the machine to fit under my desk, which limits the height to 24 inches. I want to be able to have at least three internal disk drives. I want a solid state boot disk. I want a quiet machine. I want the machine to be easy to work on. I’d like on-site service in case I don’t feel like fixing the machine myself. I am operating system agnostic, since the new computer will be simply a vehicle for running Photoshop and Lightroom.

I started my search by picking four vendors: Apple, Dell, hp, and Lenovo, the largest and the most well-known workstation manufacturers. A little research produced a surprise. Apple is not always the highest-cost alternative. In fact, because all the manufacturers charge exorbitantly for RAM, disks, and high-performance processors, it makes sense to purchase basic configurations and upgrade them yourself. This means that the difference in base machine cost is not worth worrying about. Power supply efficiency is similar across the machines of interest, running at 85% except for one high power hp supply which gets 89%. Workstations are smaller than they used to be, and all the computers I looked at will fit under my desk.

I ran into a memory expandability problem with the Mac Pro, the Lenovo C20, and the hp Z600. None of these computers will allow 48 GB of RAM (assuming 8 GB DIMMs) with a single processor. The Mac Pro stops at 32 GB, only 24 GB of which is fast because of the way that the Westmere/Nehalem Xeon memory architecture works: there are three memory busses, called channels, and maximum interleaving occurs with the same number of DIMMs on each channel. The C20 and Z600 have more sensible DIMM counts (one per channel), with the same result: if you want more than 24 GB, you need to add another processor.

I threw out the Dell T5500 because it only has two internal disk bays. That left me with the Dell T7500, the Lenovo S20 and D20, and the hp Z800.

Technical, The Bleeding Edge

← 2880 vs 1440 dpi printing Computer sound levels →

Comments

  1. Marko says

    April 7, 2011 at 4:41 am

    Hi, Lenovo TS C20x has ability for 48GB RAM with single CPU …

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

March 2023
S M T W T F S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jan    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • Good 35-70 MF lens
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • Sarmed Mirza on Fujifilm GFX 100S pixel shift, visuals
  • lancej on Two ways to improve the Q2 handling
  • JimK on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • K on Sony 135 STF on GFX-50R, sharpness
  • Mal Paso on Christmas tree light bokeh with the XCD 38V on the X2D
  • Sebastian on More on tilted adapters
  • JimK on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • Kyle Krug on On microlens size in the GFX 100 and GFX 50R/S
  • JimK on Hasselblad X2D electronic shutter scan time

Archives

Copyright © 2023 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.