• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / Technical / Wag the dog, part two

Wag the dog, part two

June 27, 2011 JimK 1 Comment

I’m a day into this experiment (using the Leica 16-18-21 mm Tri-Elmar on the Sony NEX-5), and I have good news and bad news.

First, the good news:

The lens is really sharp. That’s no surprise. What is a surprise is how little sharpness is lost because of the Sony’s antialiasing filter.

The NEX-5 manual focus assist feature is just great, if your hand is steady or you can find something solid to rest the camera on. The way it works is really convenient: in normal shooting mode the bottom button on the back of the camera activates the manual focus assist feature – press it once and it magnifies the live view image in the LCD display by seven times; press it again and it doubles that magnification. The image you use for focusing is kind of harsh, but it’s perfectly adequate. What makes it so wonderful is not that it has more magnification than other cameras, or that it has a better image. What makes it so good is that the magnified focus assist is so conveniently accessed.

The big (by point-and-shoot standards), heavy (by small format wide-angle standards) lens on the tiny light, body adds up to a convenient, highly portable system. You could even call it pocketable, if you have baggy pockets. It’s definitely a portability win over putting the Tri-Elmar on an M9.

It’s nice not to have to worry about moiré-looking aliasing rainbow patterns.

Now, the bad news:

The NEX-body-to-Leica-M-lens adapter I’m using, from RainbowImaging, is too short, meaning that it puts the mounting flange of the Tri-Elmar too close to the Sony imaging plane. When the lens is focused on infinity using live view, the focus indicator on the lens itself is halfway between eight and 15 feet. Coincidentally, when focused that way, the infinity marker on the lens lines up with the edge of the right hand 21 mm f/4 depth-of-field indicator.

The fact that this flange distance problem matters so much shows just how optimistic the Leica depth of field indicators are. Sure, they’re set up for 35mm full frame, and for a camera with a 1.5 X multiplier, you should probably use the next wider stop. If I do that, and set that focal length to 16 mm and the f-stop to 5.6, I should be able to focus to indicated infinity and get an acceptably sharp image. It’s not even close to sharp.

Rather than conducting the rest of my testing using one of the depth of field markers to focus by, I’m going to order another lens adapter, and hope that I get one that’s more accurate than the RainbowImaging adapter.

 

Technical, The Last Word

← Wag the dog Style envy →

Comments

  1. Jim says

    June 27, 2011 at 7:48 pm

    I ordered the Novoflex adapter. Price? About 10 times what the RainbowImaging adapter costs. I sure hope it fixes the problem. It occurs to me that the NEX-5 flange distance could be off; with an autofocus lens, who would know the difference?

    We’ll see…

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.