• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 1968 Laguna Seca USRRC — drivers

1968 Laguna Seca USRRC — drivers

April 2, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

I recently discovered six pages of 35mm Tri-X negatives of the May, 1968 running of the United States Road Race of Champions (USRRC) at Laguna Seca. I scanned them on a not-very-good flatbed scanner, and will be posting some of them over the next couple of days.

Photographically, they’re not much.

However, as a look at motor racing almost fifty years ago, they show just how much things have changed.

The cars were not so precisely engineered. In fact, some of them look thrown together in somebody’s garage.

The variety of vehicle designs is striking. This class shared the — very short — rulebook with the Can Am cars of the era. The USRRC races were in the spring; the Can Am ones were in the fall. The general plan was to put a big honking America V8 amidships of a purpose-built roadster-style race car. In fact, all the cars in this race, save a Porsche 906 driven by Milt Mitner follow that formula. Bruce McLaren made bodies and chassis which he sold to others. You will see many of these cars in the pictures, although you won’t see the ones that Bruce and his driver Denny Hulme campaigned at this race; they sat it out for some reason.

There were RVs in the pits, but none of the huge support vehicles and purpose-built transporters that characterize racing today. Also absent was any noticeable sponsor or VIP presence; most of the people in the pits were there to drive or work on the cars, or friends and family of those people.

Let’s look a some of the drivers:

Ed Leslie
Ed Leslie
Mark Donohue
Mark Donohue
Mark Donohue
Mark Donohue
Bud Morley
Bud Morley
Sam Posey
Sam Posey
Lothar Motchenbacher
Lothar Motchenbacher
Ed Leslie
Ed Leslie
Mark Donohue
Mark Donohue
Lothar Motchenbacher
Lothar Motchenbacher
Jim Hall
Jim Hall

 

The Last Word

← Sloof Lirpa announces high dynamic range camera 1968 Laguna Seca USRRC — pits →

Comments

  1. Gregg Gleason says

    October 8, 2019 at 3:14 pm

    Good stuff! I remember those days very well. The cars were very fast (and not particularly safe), the engineers didn’t have the advantages of high-powered computers to help with calculating drag coefficient, etc., and the drivers were brave. Thanks!

    As an aside, I now am beginning to use the Sony Ar7iv and 200-600 for bird photography here in Florida and am looking forward to the winter birding season. My Nikon 600/4 was getting a bit heavy for this old man.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.