• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / 8-bit filters in Photoshop CC

8-bit filters in Photoshop CC

July 15, 2018 JimK 4 Comments

Last night I was working on an image that had a lot of small imperfections in flat areas that had been emphasized by Helicon stacking. In Photoshop CC, I created a duplicate layer, and applied the dust and scratches filter.

Oops. Contouring.

I scratched my head and tried a median filter. Same damn thing.

Thinking it could be the display subsystem, I wrote out the file and looked at in in Lightroom. Still there.

Is it possible that the Noise filters are only 8-bits? Indeed it is.

The most recent document I can find on the Adobe web site says the following:

The following filters support 16-bit/channel and 32-bit/channel documents:

  • All Blur filters (except for Lens Blur and Smart Blur)
  • All Distort filters
  • The Noise > Add Noise filter
  • All Pixelate filters
  • All Render filters (except for Lighting Effects)
  • All Sharpen filters (except for Sharpen Edges)
  • The following filters under Filter > Stylize:
    • Diffuse
    • Emboss
    • Trace Contour
  • All Video filters
  • All filters under Filter > Other

I’ll have to use less-effective 16-bit filters from now on. That’s too bad. I’m also concerned that I may have missed banding in files that I have previously edited. I’ll have to do some looking.

I wonder when Adobe is going to make all the filters 16-bit?

The Last Word

← Screen captures with a7RIII pixel shift A new use for the Lightroom Dehaze tool →

Comments

  1. Bruce Oudekerk says

    July 15, 2018 at 5:42 pm

    I have known that some of the filters in PS were 8 bit but I thought that they were all ghosted in Photoshop’s dropdown menus when using a 16 bit file. What I find confusing is that in my up-to-date PS 19.1.5, some filters Adobe identifies as 16 bit are ghosted (but un-ghost when changing to 8 bit mode) and some of the supposedly 8 bit filters identified on Adobe’s list are not ghosted.

    The cynic in me thinks it might be Adobe-confusing but not Adobe-surprising.

    Bruce

    Reply
  2. janne says

    July 16, 2018 at 2:23 am

    The filters themselves use 16bits, but the image under 50% zoom is 8bit.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 16, 2018 at 6:15 am

      I’m seeing contouring at 100%.

      Reply
  3. Bill Janes says

    July 17, 2018 at 6:53 am

    If the Adobe NR filters are only 8 bit and induce banding in the image, it might be worthwhile to try some of the third party filters such as Topaz Denoise or Nik Define? Are these 16 bit?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.