• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report — a hard look at the book

A book report — a hard look at the book

October 20, 2016 JimK 6 Comments

This is part of a series about my experiences in publishing a book. The series starts here.

Well, I now have what many photographers fervently want — and, maybe, dread — a garage full of books. Yesterday I took a good long look at the final product of some 18 months of work. Today, I’ll share what I found with you all.

I ordered 1000 books, 50 of which were to be shipped in slipcases with a portfolio into which two actual  inkjet prints could be inserted. I’ll go through details of one of the boxed books, since the 950 unboxed books are just like the book inside the slipcase.

Here’s the slipcase with the book and the folder inside. You can see the embossed, metallic-foil-filled printing on the front of the slipcase:

_d518863

Here’s what the case looks like from the open end. Since there’s a title on the spine of the book and the book’s dust jacket, there’s no need for embossed lettering on the side of the slipcase opposite the opening:

_d518929

Here’s a couple of closer looks at the embossing, The embossing on the spine and cover of the books themselves is similar:

_d518906

_d518935

Here is the book out of the slipcase with the portfolio folder on top of it:

_d518872

Opening up the folder reveals the corners to hold the prints in place:

_d518875

The book has a French fold dustcover, which means the top and bottom portoins are folded over so that there’s no paper edge visible when the book is closed. When you peel back the dustcover, you can see the way it’s folded. Also note the die-cut corners that keep the edges of the dustcover from catching on things:

_d518883

Here’s a closer look at the die-cut corners:

_d518887

If you have been reading this saga about getting a book published all along, you will recall that there are several images that span the gutter of the book, and that page flatness has been something that has accounted for a lot of my attention, and caused a great deal of angst.

Here’s what the book looks like when you just open it up to the middle of a signature. This book had never been opened before I took this picture, and I did not try to flatten that pages before I made the exposure:

_d518907

If you press the pages down, you can see the threading:

_d518909

A closer look:

_d518912

I wonder if it was a good idea to have the images that span the gutter appear at the center of the signatures.

If you look at a gutter-spanning image that’s not at the center of a signature, here’s what you see:

_d518915

A closer look:

_d518916

The pages are not laying anywhere near as flat as I hoped they would. There’s a reason for that:

_d518917

You’ll note that the internal spine of the book is not bending upwards as it should. In fact, it is almost flat. This is not the way that I expected it to be. In fact, it is exactly the situation that Jerry and I worked so hard to avoid. It is also completey different from the way the internal spine worked in the sample bound book. That one worked fine.

Is it just a bad sample? Sadly, no. I have looked at half a dozen books, and they are all substantially the same.

What went wrong? I will investigate and report back, but I suspect that I’ll never know.

 

 

 

The Last Word

← A book report — the books arrive A book report — a look at the content →

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    October 20, 2016 at 6:32 pm

    Bummer.

    I recall a book by Dan Margulis (“Professional Photoshop”) where an ongoing topic was the difficulty of dealing with commercial printers.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      October 21, 2016 at 12:30 pm

      The color management protocol that I touched on earlier aside, Hemlock has done things just the way I’d have wanted them to. And I understand why they want to do the color management the way they do. So I’ve got no beef with the printer.

      The issue of the page flatness is one of binding, and the communications channel (me to designer to printer to binder) has not been the best. Still, Hemlock went the extra mile and set up a teleconference with representatives from all four constituencies to hash out the page flatness issue several months ago.

      The most frustrating thing for me is that I know Roswell could have bound my book the way I wanted it bound. They proved that with the binding test copy.

      Jim

      Reply
  2. David Braddon-mitchell says

    October 21, 2016 at 12:43 am

    Looks wonderful otherwise…

    Reply
    • Jim says

      October 21, 2016 at 12:23 pm

      It does indeed. The glue in the binding aside, I think that Roswell did a great job binding the book, and the construction of the slipcases and portfolio folder is top-notch. Everything lines up perfectly, there’s no glue that seeped out, etc. And the binding glue that made the inner spines too stiff is perfect in another way: there is absolutely no glue leakage through the stitching holes.

      Jim

      Reply
  3. JG says

    October 22, 2016 at 4:18 pm

    Roswell is local to me … you want me to go rough ’em up a bit for you?

    All joking aside, the book otherwise looks quite nice … congratulations!

    Reply
    • Jim says

      October 22, 2016 at 4:52 pm

      Let me be clear about Roswell. Except for the page flatness issue, which I’m not sure they ever fully understood, I couldn’t have asked for better service or a higher-quality product.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.