• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report: proof sheets

A book report: proof sheets

May 10, 2015 JimK 1 Comment

This is post ten in a series about my experiences in publishing a book. The series starts here.

Before I obsess too much over mapping the gamut of the Staccato images to Coated GRACoL 2006, I needed to get an idea of how much trouble I was in. It’s one thing to look at the compressed gamut images on a monitor, and quite another to see them on a piece of paper.

I wrote out TIFF copies of all of the candidate images from Lightroom in ProPhoto RGB. In Photoshop, I created an action to convert the images to Coated GRACoL 2006 with a relative colorimetric Intent, then back to ProPhoto RGB.

RT gracol

I ran the action on all the TIFFs, then imported the newly gamut-limited images back into Lightroom. I created a 4×7 image template and printed all of the images on four sheets of C-sized Exhibition Fiber paper:

Lrthumbs

Then I took a good look. I was surprised how good almost all the images looked, and by how effective was the intervention on the massage parlor image that I reported on in the  last post. I’d some another similar luminance mapping change to this image:

Billiard Parlor, Houston Street, NYC

It really helped, too.

My next step is to pore over the proof sheets for a while, and mark the images that will need some more color mapping.

I’m glad I did this early proofing. It gives me a lot of confidence that I can make this project an esthetic success.

The Last Word

← A book report: gamut mapping example Modeling camera motion →

Trackbacks

  1. A book report — hard proofing | The Last Word says:
    May 14, 2016 at 5:44 pm

    […] I previously reported on gang hard proofing. Yesterday, Jerry asked me for the final copies of each of the images for the book. I had previously identified seven images for which the standard Adobe gamut mapping with relative colorimetric intent were not acceptable. I turned on Lightroom’s soft proofing feature and set the output medium to Coated GRACoL 2006 (ISO 12647-2:2004). I created virtual copies of the seven images. I made corrections with the adjustment brush, and exported the images to .psd files in ProPhoto RGB. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.