• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / A book report — signing off on the dummy

A book report — signing off on the dummy

May 10, 2016 JimK 2 Comments

This is a continuation of a series of posts that I started what seems like a long time ago about getting a book designed and published. The series starts here.

This is a continuation in what seemed to be a never ending struggle to get the pages to lie flat enough for the gutter-spanning images to look good.

I went to Jerry Takigawa’s office yesterday to see the latest dummy, the one with the polyurethane reactive (PUR) glue that was supposed to be applied more thinly and be more flexible, and the heavy pages, which were supposed to pull the book open more.

The spine did not tent up when the book was open:

kasson dummy

The pages folded flatter than the picture above, but the spine stayed flat. Not what we were looking for.

The dummy book with the polyvinyl acetate (PVA) had a spine that bent properly:

What we want the book to look like.

However, the less viscous PVA glue had seeped through the holes created when the signatures were stitched, not only at the center of the signatures, but a little bit in the other pages. Jerry is worried that the glue seepage, which is essentially invisible in the white dummy pages, would stand out against a gutter-spanning image, or, worse, cause the ink to be pulled off the page as the book is opened.

Also, if we go with PVA, we’re taking Roswell, the bindery, outside of its comfort zone; they have essentially switched to PUR for this kind of book.

So, the choices were to re-layout the book, greatly reducing number of or eliminating all the images that span the gutter, or going with PUR and living with pages that aren’t flat.

It seemed that the heavy paper was helping a lot, and I’m tired of messing with the layout, so I said to go with the PUR binding and the heavy paper. It’s been frustrating, I’m kind of beaten down, and I figure at this point the best is probably the enemy of the good. I certainly don’t want to look for another printer.

This supposed to be fun, right?

The Last Word

← Long lens IR E-mount lens longevity →

Comments

  1. Lynn Allan says

    May 10, 2016 at 7:09 pm

    Frustrating. I have no experience with making books of any kind, least of all “art books”. I’d have thought you wouldn’t have to “re-invent the wheel on this”.

    Any idea of how much the book will retail for? I might put in a “patron request” to our local library. It seems to be rather well funded, and typically approves many of my 20+ patron requests per year.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      May 11, 2016 at 8:31 am

      I’d have thought you wouldn’t have to “re-invent the wheel on this”.

      Yeah, me, too.

      Any idea of how much the book will retail for?

      I don’t know. All in, a thousand books are going to cost me about $75 apiece. If I sell them to Amazon at cost, I don’t know how much they’ll mark them up, but I don’t think it will turn out to be an attractive price. I have in mind another way of distributing the book, and there will be a way for my blog readers to take advantage of that. That’s all I can say now.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.