• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Cruising with the Sony a7RII – equipment failure.

Cruising with the Sony a7RII – equipment failure.

September 22, 2015 JimK 8 Comments

Two years ago, I took a boat trip from Montreal down the St. Lawrence and through the Canadian Maritime Provinces. I took a Sony RX1 and a Leica M240. The Sony didn’t survive the first leg of the journey, and I used the Leica exclusively. This occurrence was the source of some merriment on one of the Leica forums.

_DSC5953

On this trip, I only had one major equipment failure. When I was using the Leica 16-18-21mm f/4 Tri-Elmar (aka the WATE) on the second day on the boat, I noticed that the aperture click stops were weaker than usual. Then I found a little for-and-aft play in the aperture ring. The diaphragm seemed to work alright, so I just kept shooting.

_DSC7907

On a walk along a bear trail on the third day, the lens hood fell off. The WATE lens hood is not supposed to be removable, so this was a source of some concern. The click stops were entirely MIA now, but I kept using the lens. Then two more pieces (that I know of) fell off. I stuffed the parts in my pocket and the camera in my fanny pack. The lens will have to go to the Leica lens doctor in Los Angeles.

_DSC7847

I’ve never had a lens just fall apart on me. I’ve had diaphragms get oily or helicoids get sticky, but I’ve never previously experienced a lens converting itself into a pile of parts. This is especially puzzling since the lens has suffered no ill treatment.

_DSC6415

Leica is a revered name in photography. They tout their craftsmanship and quality. Their products are priced at astronomical levels. So I am surprised that my first experience with what I’m now calling SLD (spontaneous lens disassembly) should occur with a Leica lens.

_DSC6466

The Last Word

← Cruising with the Sony a7RII – clothing and gear toting Cruising with the Sony a7RII – Exposure strategy →

Comments

  1. CarVac says

    September 22, 2015 at 3:20 pm

    From what I read, the hood does indeed screw off, revealing red threading that warns you about the newly protruding front element.

    No clue about the click stops, though.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      September 22, 2015 at 4:14 pm

      The piece that came off first is the hood and the ring with the lens type and serial number on it. The ring is loose inside the hood, but I can’t get the two pieces apart. There is no red threading, but there is a red anodized ring attached to the back of the hood.

      Reply
  2. Chris Livsey says

    September 22, 2015 at 11:35 pm

    In the UK “aggressive pricing” is used to describe a policy of pricing to undercut the competition to a point they will struggle to match and still make a profit. Note undercut, maybe our common language is separating us.
    Less traumatic, until I found out what a replacement cost was, a 28mm f2 Summicron Asph lens hood fell apart on me, curiously on a cruise, during a stop on Madeira.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      September 23, 2015 at 8:27 am

      It can mean both things on this side of the pond, Chris, depending on the context. I’ll make a change to make the meaning clearer.

      Thanks,

      Jim

      Reply
  3. Jack Hogan says

    September 23, 2015 at 12:04 am

    Nice series, Jim, reminds me of my four years in BC.

    Reply
  4. Christer Almqvist says

    September 23, 2015 at 6:49 am

    QUOTE: So I am surprised that my first experience with what I’m now calling SLD (spontaneous lens disassembly) should occur with a Leica lens. UNQUOTE

    That must be due to lack of experience with Leica lenses.

    My pre-aspheric 35 mm Summicron literally fell apart twice. No problem for my dealer; he put it all together again in less than 10 minutes, saying he had been faced with that problem several times with that type of lens. So I bought the ASPH version. I did not experience any Spontaneous LEICA Disassembly with that lens.

    Reply
  5. Ron says

    September 23, 2015 at 6:33 pm

    I experienced SLD with a Leica 50 Lux ASPH. I had the lens mounted on an M9 and heard a metallic tinkling sound at my feet while out shooting test images because the lens had just come back from recalibration by Leica. Looking down and there was the lens hood assembly (it’s built into the lens and not supposed to come off!) as well as the lens name ring and a couple other parts. None of the optics detached.

    I tried to put the one sole screw back in place to secure the hood assembly on the lens, but something appeared to be stripped. Turns out the hood assembly was held in place by that single screw and a few dabs of some sort of glue. The glue looked to have dried out and my ‘manhandling’ of the lens by mounting and dismounting it from the camera while holding it by the lens hood probably worked the screw loose….

    I love that lens, optically, but can’t believe someone intentionally designed the hood assembly to be held in place by a single, tiny screw and a bit of glue.

    FWIW, I’ve read stories of the 28 Cron also eventually working itself loose and there’s a video tutorial somewhere on YouTube with the steps outlining how to fix it yourself. Its hood is also known to come apart, and/or crack around the viewfinder cutout, which mine has.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Cruising with the Sony a7RII – summary | The Last Word says:
    September 27, 2015 at 12:52 am

    […] The Leica 16-18-21mm f/4 Tri-Elmar (WATE) is a perfect match for the camera. The lens is small and light, and fits the body well in that respect. While soft in the corners wide-open, stopping down to f/8 affords crisp performance across the frame, and even f/5.6 is pretty good. As you might expect, there is a significant amount of edge falloff, which can be fixed in post (at a sacrifice of dynamic range), or left alone in the cases where it enhances the image. Unfortunately, my WATE experienced spontaneous lens disassembly (SLD) early in the trip, and didn’…. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.