• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / D810 EFCS and flash synch

D810 EFCS and flash synch

October 5, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

Earlier today, I posted the results of a test of the maximum synch speed of the Sony a7RII with both EFCS on and EFCS off. It appeared that the camera’s true synch speed was 1/200 second in both modes.

That got me wondering. Would the D810, with a specified synch speed of 1/320 second, fare about the same?

I put an AF-S 85mm f/1.4 Nikon G lens on a D810, and aimed the camera at a white wall in manual exposure mode and the aperture set to f/11. I connected the hot shoe directly (all copper, no IR or radio synch) to a Paul Buff Einstein and set the flash for a full 640 watt-second dump. I made exposures at 1/400, 1/320, and 1/250, with EFCS on and off.

The images:

EFCS on, 1/400 second
EFCS on, 1/400 second
EFCS off, 1/400 second
EFCS off, 1/400 second

About the same margin in both cases.

EFCS on, 1/320 second
EFCS on, 1/320 second
EFCS off, 1/320 second
EFCS off, 1/320 second

Just like the a7RII, the camera doesn’t quite meet its spec.

EFCS on, 1/250 second
EFCS on, 1/250 second
EFCS off, 1/250 second
EFCS off, 1/250 second

Cutting the camera a camera a little slack results in a nicely exposed image.

I have to ask myself, after being zero for two in finding a camera that meets its max synch speed spec, if there’s something wrong with my test. Yes, there is. For the answer look here.

 

 

 

The Last Word

← Mixing and matching lenses and cameras a7Rii, D810 flash synch revisited →

Comments

  1. Mike Aubrey says

    October 5, 2015 at 3:50 pm

    The Olympus E-M1 is said to be above spec for sync speed, being rated to sync at 1/320, but actually being able to sync at 1/500.

    I’ve tested my old E-M5 and found it similar: rated for 1/250, but being able to sync at 1/320.

    Reply
  2. N/A says

    October 5, 2015 at 6:00 pm

    > The Olympus E-M1 is said to be above spec for sync speed, being rated to sync at 1/320, but actually being able to sync at 1/500.

    1/500 only if you are in 16:9 mode with flash on a hot shoe with cropping in raw conversion to that mode…

    Also when I tested remote (radio, non TTL) firing with E-M1 ans A7mkI I got :

    Olympus E-M1 + Cactus v5 radio /non TTL/to Cactus v5 + Yongnuo YN560 mk I = 1/320 xsync in 4:3 aspect w/o shutter blade shading

    Sony A7 + Cactus v5 radio /non TTL/ to Cactus v5 + Yongnuo YN560 mk I = 1/250 xsync in 3:2 aspect w/o shutter blade shading

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.