• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Dancing flowers and grasses

Dancing flowers and grasses

May 25, 2020 JimK 6 Comments

A few weeks ago, I showed  you some images I’ve been making in my studio by shining light through a Japanese bamboo sculpture. Last summer, I had been creating some heavily manipulated images by writing computer programs to perform distortion and fusing of conventional still photographs. I set that aside when I got involved with the kaleidoscope movies, and then getting ready for the Chronography exhibition at the Monterey Museum of Art consumed all my  photographic time.  A couple of weeks ago, I dusted off the distortion and fusing software, made some additions, and used it on the bamboo-lit subjects. At first I used images that I’d created to stand on their own, but it didn’t take me long to figure out that those weren’t the best place to start for these manipulated images, and since then I’ve been shooting my subjects with computer processing and fusion in mind.

Here are some examples.

 

 

Here’s a bare-bones description of the process: I make focused-stacked sets with a GFX 100 and the 120/4 macro, stack them in Helicon Focus, and send them in sets of three or 4 to a Matlab program that I’ve written that manipulates and fuses them. Then I bring the fused images into Photoshop and make some edits. The lighting for the shots is an Aputure 300x with the 19-degree lens and the iris diaphragm shone through the Japanese bamboo sculpture.

A few more:

 

 

 

 

The Last Word

← Two digital camera color fallacies Picking a camera is like picking a dog? →

Comments

  1. Mike Nelson Pedde says

    May 25, 2020 at 9:50 pm

    “and then getting ready for the Chronology exhibition at the Monterey Museum of Art… ”

    Shouldn’t that be Chronography?

    Mike.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      May 26, 2020 at 8:13 am

      Indeed it should. Fixed now. Thanks.

      Reply
  2. Jeffrey Horton says

    May 28, 2020 at 9:20 pm

    This is beautiful, looking forward to seeing more of your work.

    Reply
  3. Adam Bridge says

    September 17, 2020 at 10:38 am

    Thank you for your write up. I’d love to understand your process in a bit more detail if you’d be willing to write it up. I got lost on the process after the Helicon focus stacking.

    I would be really interested in seeing your work. Is it on display in Monterey or the Bay Area?

    Definitely saving your site. I greatly appreciate your sharing. It’s inspiring me to be more experimental.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      September 17, 2020 at 11:27 am

      I would be really interested in seeing your work. Is it on display in Monterey or the Bay Area?

      There’s an 8×10 in the Center for Photographic Art’s current exhibition.Doesn’t really do justice to the image, but the ground rules for that show limit the image size.

      Reply
    • JimK says

      September 17, 2020 at 11:28 am

      I’d love to understand your process in a bit more detail if you’d be willing to write it up. I got lost on the process after the Helicon focus stacking.

      Are you a computer programmer? If not, more detail probably wouldn’t help much.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.