• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Dither and image detail, natural scene

Dither and image detail, natural scene

April 16, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

For the past few days, I’ve been trying to determine — yet again, with new criteria —  how much read noise is necessary to properly dither an analog to digital converter of a given precision. Specifically, I’m trying to figure out what the relationship is between dither and quantizing precision when resolving detail is the main criterion. The conclusion has been that, just as for the avoidance of posterization ( see here, here, and here), half a least-significant bit (LSB) rms was enough Gaussian noise for most purposes. For critical judgements, it looked like 0,7 bits was slightly better.

We used test targets for the past few days. Now I’m doing to see what happens with a natural scene, specifically, this one:

Hills

This image has fine detail along the ridge line, and, since it’s going to be images on a simulated 250 pixel wide sensor, fine detail in the entire unshadowed part of the foreground.

Here are some details of the camera simulator parameters used to test the various ADC precisions and noise levels:

Other camera simulator details:

  • f/2 diffraction-limited lens
  • 450, 550, and 650 nm light
  • 4.88 um pixel pitch, 250 pixels wide
  • 30:1 presampling resolution (7500 pixels wide)
  • Adobe RGB GBRG CFA
  • 100% fill factor
  • AHD demosaicing
  • Noise patterns are the same for all images, appropriately scaled.
  • Images enlarged to 300% of original size (750 pixels wide) for posting here.
  • Full range input image, so adding noise to the simulated capture can exceed the camera’s range
  • Values below the black point are clipped
  • Values above full scale are clipped

Here’s a set with noise equal to half an LSB of the 3 bit converter, a full LSB for the 4 bit converter, and 2 LSBs for the 5 bit converter. Thus the noise voltage remains the same if the full scale voltage remains the same, regardless of the precision of the ADC:

3 bit precision, 1/2 LSB noise
3 bit precision, 1/2 LSB noise
4 bit precision, 1 LSB noise
4 bit precision, 1 LSB noise
5 bit precision, 2 LSB noise
5 bit precision, 2 LSB noise

Increasing the dither a bit, to 0.7 LSB of the 3 bit converter, 1.4 LSB for the 4 bit converter, and 2.8 LSBs for the 5 bit converter:

3 bit precision, 0.7 LSB noise
3 bit precision, 0.7 LSB noise
4 bit precision, 1.4 LSB noise
4 bit precision, 1.4 LSB noise
5 bit precision, 2.8 LSB noise
5 bit precision, 2.8 LSB noise

Increasing the dither  to 1 LSB of the 3 bit converter, 2 LSB for the 4 bit converter, and 4 LSBs for the 5 bit converter.

3 bit precision, 1 LSB noise
3 bit precision, 1 LSB noise
4 bit precision, 2 LSB noise
4 bit precision, 2 LSB noise
5 bit precision, 4 LSB noise
5 bit precision, 4 LSB noise

I find that there is even less to distinguish among the images in each of the three sets than with the text targets. As before, the noise is rendered less objectionable with finer quantizing.

If I keep working on this project, I expect the estate of Georges Seurat is going to get on my case.

 

 

The Last Word

← Dither and image detail, low contrast Image noise and print size →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    April 17, 2016 at 12:29 am

    Ok Jim, I am convinced, 0.7LSB it is. Now what about your gentleman friend?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.