• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / ETTR — the return of the spotmeter?

ETTR — the return of the spotmeter?

December 5, 2012 JimK 1 Comment

From the mailbag:

With a hint and some assistance from George Jardine, I finally figured out how to optimize exposure (ETTR).

The key was George’s statement that he spot metered for the highest significant tone, and placed it just under clipping.

As you have found, the histogram lies and matrix, evaluative, center weighted metering is not reliable to meter and add an offset…even with white balance manipulations.

You are correct….LR 4 automatically applies recovery.  If you test against RawDigger, you will find that any LR highlight above 95-96 is clipped in at least one channel, usually the green.

With testing, I have found that adding +3 EC to the spot metered highlight will create an LR image with the highest (significant) highlight at the 95-96 point.

Try it, I think you will agree.  The beauty is it is absolutely consistent.

Metering his way also is a good way to do HDR bracketing.  ETTR, this way, will maximize dynamic range capture.  If the entire low end of the range is not included in the histogram, bracket steps of higher EC until the low end has a significant gap away from the left edge.

Hope this helps….and that I am not preaching to the choir…..

Shades of the old days!  I see no reason why this won’t work, but there are some caveats.

  • You need to be able to make sure you can find the key highlight.
  • The key highlight needs to subtend a visual angle greater than or equal to one degree.
  • Your spotmeter and the sensor need to be calibrated to each other, and that calibration needs to track over temperature.
  • The highlight can’t have high chromaticity, since the spotmeter at best responds to luminance, and, at worst responds to some spectral curve peculiar to its photon detector.

I will dust off my Minolta Spotmeter F and give it a try.

The Last Word

← Testing for ETTR, part 6 ETTR testing, part 7 →

Trackbacks

  1. ETTR by spot metering, part 2 | The Last Word says:
    December 8, 2012 at 10:40 am

    […] after I made this post, the reader who made the initial suggestion sent me an email with some comments and clarifications. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.