• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Testing for ETTR, part 6

Testing for ETTR, part 6

December 5, 2012 JimK 3 Comments

I’m pretty happy with the image settings I came up with to make the D4 in-camera histogram approximate the real raw histogram. Using those settings, however, means not having the convenience of the D4’s exemplary automatic white balance. I guess I’ll use it with fixed white balance  when I really care about getting the ultimate image quality, and with auto white balance when I want to minimize the time spent in Lightroom.

I still need to figure out if this trick works over a wide range of subject matter and lighting conditions. I also need to find out how transferable it is to other camera models.

Stay tuned.

The Last Word

← Testing for ETTR, part 5 ETTR — the return of the spotmeter? →

Comments

  1. John Barrow says

    December 5, 2012 at 7:28 pm

    Hi Jim,

    This is a fascinating series. Thanks! How do your findings tie in with the UniWB approach sometimes recommended? UniWB involves loading a linear Custom Curve and using a preset WB. It also results in a more accurate camera histogram but at the cost of a greenish image on the camera lcd.

    John.

    Reply
  2. Jim says

    December 6, 2012 at 11:18 am

    John,

    Thanks for the pointer. I had not heard of UniWB. I’ve looked at this web site: http://www.guillermoluijk.com/tutorial/uniwb/index_en.htm

    The UniWB technique described there seems to have the same goal as my ad hoc approach, but proceeds in a much more organized fashion, and will almost certainly yield more precise results. It’s unfortunate that the shortcut mentioned at the end of the article won’t work with some cameras, but it’s simple and elegant for those cameras that don’t prevent it from operating.

    Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Testing for ETTR, part 8 | The Last Word says:
    December 7, 2012 at 4:58 pm

    […] a comment to this post, a reader asked me to compare the ad hoc color balance adjustment technique that I developed a few […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

June 2025
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • DC Wedding Photographer on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • DC wedding photographer on A Modest Proposal
  • NiceDays on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Christer Almqvist on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Paul R on Price and Performance: Hasselblad X vs. Fujifilm GFX
  • JimK on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Jack Hogan on Diffraction and the Airy disk diameter
  • Jack Hogan on Do Raw Developers Use the Embedded JPEG as a Color Reference?
  • Štěpán Kaňa on A Modest Proposal
  • John Vickers on Mitigating lighting banding in GFX ES images

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.