• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Focus Shift and LoCA in the Nikon 105/2.8 macro

Focus Shift and LoCA in the Nikon 105/2.8 macro

April 27, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

This is a continuation of testing of  the following macro lenses :

  • Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro
  • Leica 100mm f/2.8 Apo Macro-Elmarit-R
  • Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar ZF
  • Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor G VR

The test starts here:

Focus shift and LoCA in the Leica-R 100/2.8 Apo Macro

The first series of tests is aimed at determining focus shift and longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) at 1:2 (half size on the sensor), See this page for the test protocol:

Towards a macro MTF test protocol

The current version of the Nikon 105mm f/2.8 macro lens it the latest in a long line of 105 macros (Micro-Nikkors in Nikonese). Over the years they’ve gotten faster, learned how to focus to 1:1, acquired autofocus, and now, vibration reduction. Through all that time they have enjoyed an enviable reputation for superlative performance. The lens has grown in size over the years. With the adapter for E-mount attached, it’s the largest lens in this test, although not by much. The focusing helicoid is numb and very fast. It doesn’t take much over 180 degrees to get the focus point from infinity to life size. As you might expect, the lens is essentially impossible to focus accurately with the ring. However at distance you can use the autofocus and close up you can leave the ring alone and move the camera, so that is not a crippling flaw.

LoCA at f/2.8:

nikon loca 28

The vertical axis is MTF50, measured in cycles per picture height (cy/ph). The horizontal axis is camera position shift in mm. The points on the left side of the graph are with the camera farther away from the subject than the points on the right. I used a 50 um (0.05 mm) step size. The three raw channels are plotted.

The spread among the peaks of the three raw channels is about half a millimeter, which is excellent.

The peak MTF50 of the blue channel is disappointing.

At f/4:

nikon loca 40

The lens as a whole is getting sharper, and the blue channel, though still last, has improved dramatically. The LoCA remains low.

At f/5.6:

nikon loca 56

Now we are seeing good solid sharpness, and the LoCA remains low.

At f/8:

nikon loca 80

We’ve lost some sharpness, and the depth of field has increased to the point where the LoCA will not be a problem.

At f/11:

Nikon loca 11

The LoCA is inconsequential.

Now we’ll regraph the same data in order to show focus shift.

In the red channel:

nikon focus shift red

Focus shift is non-monotonic. That’s a good thing. focusing wide open should not be a problem.

The green channel:

nikon focus shift green

F/4 and f/5.6 are the best apertures.

The blue channel:

nikon focus shift blie

For the blue channel, f/5.6 and f.8 are the best apertures. F/5.6 sounds like the plan.

 

The Last Word

← Focus shift and LoCA in Sony 90/2.8 FE Macro Macro on-axis sharpness, focus shift, and LoCA — summary →

Comments

  1. CarVac says

    April 27, 2016 at 2:27 pm

    You can clearly see the blue channel softness in test chart shots, even on only 24mp.

    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=645&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=0&CameraComp=0&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.