• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / FOCUS SHIFT AND LOCA IN THE Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar

FOCUS SHIFT AND LOCA IN THE Zeiss 100/2 Makro-Planar

April 26, 2016 JimK 1 Comment

This is a continuation of testing of  the following macro lenses :

  • Sony 90mm f/2.8 FE Macro
  • Leica 100mm f/2.8 Apo Macro-Elmarit-R
  • Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar ZF
  • Nikon 105mm f/2.8 Micro-Nikkor G VR

The test starts here:

Focus shift and LoCA in the Leica-R 100/2.8 Apo Macro

The first series of tests is aimed at determining focus shift and longitudinal chromatic aberration (LoCA) at 1:2 (half size on the sensor), See this page for the test protocol:

Towards a macro MTF test protocol

 

The Zeiss 100mm f/2 Makro-Planar has an excellent — and, as we will see,  well deserved — reputation. It is reasonably small for such a fast lens. It has a 360-degree focusing helicoid, which is adequate, but not as luxurious as the Leica’s 720-degree one. It has backwards compatibility in spades; my version, the ZF one (not the ZF/2), even has the little clot to engage the pin that the mid-sixties Nikon FTn used to determine what f-stop the lens was set to.

Let’s look at LoCA first. At f/2:

zeiss loca f20

The vertical axis is MTF50, measured in cycles per picture height (cy/ph). The horizontal axis is camera position shift in mm. The points on the left side of the graph are with the camera farther away from the subject than the points on the right. I used a 50 um (0.05 mm) step size. The three raw channels are plotted. Several things are apparent:

  • The green channel is the sharpest, followed by the green and red ones in a tie for last.
  • The point of best focus is about the same for the green and blue channels,
  • The red channel has a different point of best focus; that means the lens suffers from LoCA.
  • The spread among the peaks is a bit under 1 mm, which is about the same as the Leica at f/2.8.

At f/2.8:

zeiss loca f28

The lens is getting sharper. The LoCA spread is about the same.

At f/4:

zeiss loca f40

If anything, the LoCA spread is getting better. The lens continues to get sharper.

At f/5.6:

zeiss loca f56

The LoCA is not getting worse, and is reaching the point where the depth of field will cover it up. At this point the Leica lens had about 1.5 mm of LoCA spread, too much for depth of field to make up for.

At f/8:

zeiss loca f80

The LoCA spread has decreased to about half a mm, roughly a third of what we saw with the Leica at this aperture.

At f/11:

zeiss loca f110

You’ll never see this amount of LoCA in a real photograph.

Now we’ll regraph the same data in order to show focus shift.

In the red channel:

zeiss red focus shift

There is very little focus shift, and it has the nice property that it moves first closer, then reverses course and moves farther away as you stop down.

In the green channel:

zeiss green focus shift

Pretty similar.

In the blue channel:

zeiss blue focus shift

That’s worse, but still not bad. In all cases, f/4 and f/5.6 are the best apertures. In the green channel, f/2.8 is impressive.

The Last Word

← Focus shift and LoCA in the Leica-R 100/2.8 Apo Macro Focus shift and LoCA in Sony 90/2.8 FE Macro →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    April 26, 2016 at 1:25 pm

    Wow, this is a finely corrected lens.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.