• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fuji 23/4 AF performance on GFX — high contrast inkjet target

Fuji 23/4 AF performance on GFX — high contrast inkjet target

July 5, 2017 JimK 1 Comment

This is the 68th in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. 

In these tests, I found that the AF consistency and accuracy with a low-contrast target was good, but not great. I decided to resun the tests with a higher-contrast inkjet-printed target. The specifics:

 

  • ISO 100
  • AF-S
  • Higer contrast target, but still inkjet printed, so not as sharp as the physical razor blade
  • Spot only tested — see below for explanation
  • Spot set on the ROI, which included all of the zone plate.
  • Release priority: focus
  • Pre-trigger: 500 milliseconds, which was long enough for focus confirmation green square to flash and confirmation beep to sound in all cases
  • Manual exposure
  • Wescott LED panels set to 5500 K.
  • Electronic shutter
  • Cognisys computer-driven focusing rail
  • 32 exposures 4 mm  apart
  • Target distance at the center of the rail, about 2  meters. 
  • RAF converted to DNG in Adobe DNG Converter
  • DNG exported as TIFF mosaiced file in dcraw (document mode)
  • TIFFs cropped and raw channels selected in Matlab program
  • MTF50 of cropped TIFFs measured with MTF Mapper
  • Data assembled in Matlab
  • Data plotted in Excel

Here’s the full frame from a sample image, with the ROI marked in red:

 

 

The spot mode data for the top green raw channel, Gr:

 

What you are looking at is a standard measure of sharpness, MTF50, as measured in cycles per picture height (cy/ph) at the whole stops from f/2 through f/11. The orange line is the average, or mean, of the 32 exposures at each aperture. The gray line is that average, plus the standard deviation for the 32 exposures, and the blue line is the average minus that standard deviation. If the data were Gaussian (which it isn’t) two thirds of the values would be between the gray and the blue lines. 

Best manual focusing yields about 2400 cy/ph at f/5.6, so this quite good. The spread is much lower than with the low-contrast target and the closer focusing distance.

This is abo9ut 200 cy/ph below the best manual focusing at f/5.6 indicating that the AF system is properly prioritizing the green channel.

The best blue channel data for manual focusing is greater than 2500 cy/ph,. so the AF system is properly prioritizing the green channel.

I wanted to test zone focusing, which was better than spot with the 110/2 and 120/4, but when a switched to zone, the camera focused on the corners of the Wescott LED panels. changing the  lighting or camera orientation would have invalidated the comparison, so I gave up.

With a high-contrast target, the GFX focuses the 23/4 very well indeed.

 

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fuji 120/4 AF performance on GFX 50S revisited The right focal length for landscapes →

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S: Projects, Lenses, RAW Files, and New Filters | Fuji Addict says:
    July 7, 2017 at 12:11 pm

    […] The Last Word – Fuji 23/4 AF performance on GFX — high contrast inkjet target […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.