• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 AF accuracy

Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 AF accuracy

April 16, 2017 JimK 1 Comment

This is the 33rd in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here.

I repeated yesterday’s auto focus tests with the Fuji 120 mm f/4 macro lens instead of the 63. Here are the results:

First of all, a word of explanation for numbers you’ve probably never seen before. Yes, you are reading the curves right. At f/4 through f/8, the MTF50 (shown in cycles per picture height) of this lens is beyond the Nyquist frequency of the sensor! That’s because we are using Lightroom’s default sharpening. With no sharpening, that wouldn’t happen.

Second, we see the same kind of anomolous behavior when the lens is stopped down a bit. In this case, it looks like only f/5.6 is materially affected, but f/5.6 shouldn’t be lower than f/4 on average. 

If we look at the raw data for the 41 exposures at each f-stop, you can see that something systemic seems to be affecting the f/5.6 results. With two exceptions, they are worse than the f/4 average results.

If we look at one of the green raw channels, the spread is not as great, but we don’t see the increased resolution at f/5.6 that should be there:

I don’t know what’s going on in Lightroom to add noise to the results at f/5.6 and f/8. The reason the raw MTF50’s are lower is that Lightroom sharpens as it demosaics.

For completeness, here is the sequence data for the first green raw channel:

Here are the test conditions:

  • ISO 100.
  • 5000K illumination, bright enough so that the f/2.8 exposure was 1/320 second
  • Target distance 3 meters
  • AF focus/release/priority: focus
  • Rapid AF: off
  • Pre-AF: off
  • AF-S
  • 117 AF point mode, center point chosen, default size.
  • EFCS on
  • Lens set to C mode, and aperture controlled from the camera
  • Shutter set to A mode.
  • + 2/3 stop exposure compensation
  • Pre-release half-shutter depression time: 750 milliseconds
  • Shutter release full depression time: 250 milliseconds
  • Camera moved 4 mm between exposures over a total range of 0 to 160 mm (40 moves, 41 exposures per stop)
  • Camera motion applied by Cognisys focusing rail, with 1250 msec post-move settle time
  • Shutter timing does by the same Cognisys controller
  • RRS heavy-duty legs
  • Arca-Swiss C1 head

See the previous post for more information about the test methods

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← Fujifilm GFX with 63/2.8 AF accuracy Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 MF accuracy →

Trackbacks

  1. Fujifilm GFX 50S AF Issue and April 19th Announcement Update | Fuji Addict says:
    April 17, 2017 at 6:26 pm

    […] The Last Word – Fujifilm GFX with 120/4 AF accuracy […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • bob lozano on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.