• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / GFX 50S / Hasselblad 35/3.5 HC on GFX

Hasselblad 35/3.5 HC on GFX

April 2, 2017 JimK 13 Comments

This is the 21st in a series of posts on the Fujifilm GFX-50S. The series starts here. You should be able to find all the posts about that camera in the Category List on the right sidebar, below the Articles widget. There’s a drop-down menu there that you can use to get to all the posts in this series; just look for “GFX 50S”.

I now have three adapted lenses that work well on the GFX: the Otus 55 and 85, and the Apo-Sonnar 135/2. Both the native 63 and 120 macro work well, too. Now I need to find a wide-ish lens. I thought the Hasselblad 35 mm f/3.5 HC, originally made by Fuji and marketed by Hasselblad under their name for their H-series cameras. I mounted it to the GFX using the Fuji H-lens-to-GFX camera adapter. If you like 4:3 or squarer images, a 35mm lens on the GFX is equivalent to a 25 mm lens on a full frame (24×36 mm) camera.

Here’s the recipe for the shots to follow:

Shutter set to EFCS.  Apertures from f/3.5 to f/11 in whole stops, except for the first step. I focused three times at each aperture, and picked the sharpest images.  2-second self-timer. Arca-Swiss C1 cube on RRS sticks. Focus was upper-center-left of the image, on the trees above the roof. ll images were refocused at each aperture.Daylight white balance selected in Lightroom.

The scene wide open:

 

At the focus point at 253%:

f/3.5

Here’s how to use these highly-magnified crops. The dimensions of the GFX sensor are 8256×6192 pixels. If we make a full-frame print from the GFX on a printer with 360 pixels per inch native driver-level resolution, like the Epson inkjet printers, we’ll end up with a 23×17 inch (58×44 cm) print. The 318×246 pixel crop you’re looking at will end up 0.8333×0.6833 inches (2.12×1.74 cm). Let’s imagine that you or your viewers are critical, and will look at the 22×17 inch print from about 18 inches (conventional wisdom is that the distance would be a little greater than that, or 28 inches (the diagonal), but you did buy a high-resolution camera for a reason, didn’t you?).

The next step is dependent on your monitor pitch, which you may or may not know. Turns out, you don’t have to know it. Just take the 253% crops and view then at 1:1. How high are they? Get out your ruler and measure, or just guess. Let’s say they are 6 inches high. 6 inches is about 7 times 0.8333, so in order to view the crops the way they’d look from 18 inches on the print is to view them from 7 times as far away, or 10.5 feet.

Everything here scales proportionately. If the image on your screen is bigger than 6 inches, increase your viewing distance by the ratio of your image height to 6 inches. If you thin your viewers are going to almost get their nose to that print and look at it from six inches, divide that 10.5 feet by 3, and look at the image on the monitor from three and a half feet away.

 

f/5.6

 

f/8

 

f/11

That’s pretty darned good.

On the left-center edge:

f/3.5

 

f/5.6

 

f/8

 

f/11

 

The f/3.5 image is a tad soft, but the others are really good.

In the upper right corner:

f/3.5

Some falloff and softness is apparent, but it’s not bad at all. This lens was made to cover a much larger sensor.

f/5.6

Looking good now.

f/8

 

f/11

I think I’ve found my short lens for the GFX.

 

 

 

 

GFX 50S, The Last Word

← HC 120/4 macro & Fuji 120/4 macro on Fuji GFX Hasselblad HC 80/2.8 and HC 50-110/3.5-4.5 on Fuji GFX →

Comments

  1. Francesco Bertelli says

    March 9, 2020 at 8:52 am

    Have you compared the Hasselblad 35/3.5 to the Pentax 35mm/3.5?

    Thanks

    Reply
    • JimK says

      March 9, 2020 at 8:57 am

      No, and I’ve sold all of my Hasselblad lenses.

      Reply
      • Francesco Bertelli says

        March 9, 2020 at 2:48 pm

        so what’s your keeper in the 35mm for digital MF?

        Reply
        • JimK says

          March 9, 2020 at 3:38 pm

          When I need 35mm, I’m using the Fujifilm 32-64/4.

          Reply
  2. Erik says

    August 22, 2021 at 10:10 pm

    Hey Jim!

    Love the blog. Probably my most used review page for GFX stuff. I have the 100s now. I just got the 32-64/4. I’m not crazy about the corner performance or the focus curvature. I like primes.
    Ideally, I’d prefer Fuji made a 35mm prime. I find the GF 30mm is just a bit too wide for the way I compose. I had the GF 45mm, which is obviously an amazing lens. It might have spoiled me because now I’ve gotten used to how crisp the corners are with that lens. But I wanted the 35mm focal length so I sold it for the zoom. Do you have any other suggestions for medium format lenses that would be contenders at this focal length on the GFX 100s? Currently I have the GF 110, which is amazing, the GF 50, which I’m quite happy with, and the 32-64. I love the size and weight of the GF 45mm. Thanks!

    Reply
    • JimK says

      August 25, 2021 at 7:36 am

      Do you have any other suggestions for medium format lenses that would be contenders at this focal length on the GFX 100s?

      I’m sorry, but I do not.

      Reply
      • Erik says

        August 30, 2021 at 7:58 pm

        No worries Jim. Also, I just noticed you mentioned the 35mm on a GFX is equivalent to 25 on full frame. I’m guessing you’re using a .73 conversion factor, A lot of people are quoting .8 but I understand 3:2 and 4:3 are different aspect ratios. I love the look of 28mm on full frame. So would a 38mm more closely resemble that than a 35mm on the GFX? I really wish Fuji would make a prime between 30 and 45.

        Reply
        • JimK says

          August 30, 2021 at 8:08 pm

          I like 3:4 aspect ratio better than 2:3, so my personal conversion factor is 24/33.

          Reply
          • Erik says

            August 30, 2021 at 10:35 pm

            Oh ok! I see your rationale now. I agree that 3:4 is usually more to my taste as well.

            Reply
            • Erik says

              August 30, 2021 at 10:49 pm

              So what are your thoughts on comparing the HC 35mm with Fuji 32-64 at 35mm? I’m interested in shooting landscapes and having good corner performance. I know you sold the HC 35. Did you find it wasn’t a better performer than the native Fuji zoom overall? Or something else?

              Reply
              • JimK says

                August 31, 2021 at 7:02 am

                The 32-64 has some field curvature. It’s not bad, as such things go, but some people find it problematic for landscapes. I don’t know about field curvature with the HC 35.

                Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Future Fujifilm GFX 100S Sensor Verified and More GFX 50S Adapted Glass | Fuji Addict says:
    April 3, 2017 at 5:28 am

    […] The Last Word – Hasselblad 35/3.5 HC on GFX […]

    Reply
  2. Fujifilm GFX-50S Review says:
    April 23, 2017 at 1:28 pm

    […] well does it work with H-series Hasselblad lenses? [It’s a mixed bag. Here. Here. Here. […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.