• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Is IBIS costing you battery life in your Sony a7RII?

Is IBIS costing you battery life in your Sony a7RII?

November 2, 2016 JimK 6 Comments

This is a continuation in a series of posts on power consumption in the Sony a7RII. The more recent incarnation of the series starts here.

About the question in the post title: in a word, no. In three, somewhat more accurate words, hardly at all. In order to create a worst-case test, I told the camera that it had a 400 mm lens attached, but I had a 24 on it. So I could wave it around pretty easily. Then I triggered the oscilloscope, and after a second or so, picked up the camera and started waving it around.

Here’s what I saw (time is from left to right, and current is the vertical axis):

steady-shot

Ignore the part of the trace before it drops off the screen. Until a little past the left/right center of the image, the camera was still. IBIS was making some small corrections, as indicated by the variations in the lower parts of the trace. As I pointed out in the last post, the times of higher current draw are associated with the live view feature of the camera. On the right side of the screen, when I’m moving the camera, the current when the camera is not refreshing the live view varies more. Looking at the Keithley 2100 DMM set to average 100 current readings, it looks like IBIS can draw maybe 20 extra milliamps, and it usually is less than that.

One less thing to worry about.

Update 11/4:

Using the techniques that I describe here, I’ve gotten less noisy results.

Here’s what you see when you wave the camera around with IBIS on. The additional small current draw affects both the peaks and the valleys in the scope trace, as you would expect, since it is unlikely that the refresh rate of the live view display and the updating of the voice-coil motors that drive the IBIS occurs in synchrony.

 

ss-lcd-waving

What about IBIS power consumption when the camera is static? Here’s what you see when you half depress the shutter button, with IBIS on and IBIS off, but don’t move the camera:

IBIS on:

ss-on-delta-lcd

IBIS off:

IBIS off

 

If there’s a difference in current, it’s very hard to see, and definitely immaterial.

The Last Word

← Sony a7rII current draw — EVF vs LCD Adobe CC 2017 — GPU Sniffer inhales initial performance →

Comments

  1. Philip says

    November 5, 2016 at 8:04 am

    The camera seems to use electromagnets to centre the sensor; when the camera is switched off, the sensor moves around freely. I suspect that’s why you don’t see huge differences in current draw.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 5, 2016 at 8:21 am

      Yes, the camera uses a voice-coil actuator, just like most moving head disk drives. The question was how much juice does it take to power the VCA. Answer: not much.

      Reply
      • Philip says

        November 5, 2016 at 8:58 am

        “The question was how much juice does it take to power the VCA”
        The question I read was — “Is IBIS costing you battery life in your Sony a7RII?”

        My point was that the answer is yes but because IBIS costs battery life whether it’s “enabled” or “disabled”, it’s difficult to determine just how much current it draws. Unless I’ve misunderstood something, you have measured the current draw difference between the different states, but not the entire rig itself.

        It is interesting that it doesn’t use any extra power worth noting while in the “enabled” state though. Thank you for testing. Excluding tripod usage, I’ll keep it enabled.

        These cameras are super efficient when we consider all of the features.

        Reply
        • Jim says

          November 5, 2016 at 9:11 am

          I see your point now. You are assuming that there is no low-power “parked” position with the camera on, because there isn’t when it’s powered off. That is a reasonable assumption.

          Jim

          Reply
        • Jim says

          November 8, 2016 at 3:15 pm

          You are entirely correct, and I just proved it here:

          http://blog.kasson.com/?p=16289

          Jim

          Reply

Trackbacks

  1. Sony a7RII IBIS current draw revisited says:
    November 8, 2016 at 3:40 pm

    […] reported on the battery draining effects associated with turning on IBIS in the Sony a7RII earlier, and found little effect. In a comment (the point of which eluded me at first), a reader surmised […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.