• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — 35/2.8 Zony FE

Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — 35/2.8 Zony FE

July 23, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

This is part 2 in a series of posts on the prototype Kolari Vision thin-stack sensor modification for the Sony a7II. The series starts here.

There are many reasons to expect that lenses designed for the zero-thickness sensor stack of film will do better with a thinner stack on a digital sensor, and the previous post bears that out. However, the native Sony FE lenses are designed for the standard sensor stack thickness of the alpha 7 cameras, and putting a thinner stack on the camera might hurt their corner resolution.

To find out, I took a native FE lens with a what seems to be a fairly short distance between the exit pupil and the focal plane, the Sony/Zeiss 35 mm f/2.8 FE. This is as close as I can come to a worst-case test, since the corner effects can be expected to diminish as the exit pupil gets farther from the focal plane, as is usually the case with zooms, larger lenses, and longer focal lengths.

Here’s the scene with both the standard a7II and the Kolari-modified one, both at f/2.8:

 

Standard
Standard
Kolari
Kolari

The same color balance difference that we saw in the previous post is still with us. I’d be surprised if it weren’t. Camera on a tripod. ISO 100. Developed in Lightroom with default settings except for Daylight white balance.

Looking at the extreme lower left corner at 3:1 magnification at all the whole stops:

 

Standard f/2.8
Standard f/2.8
Kolari f/2.8
Kolari f/2.8

The Kolari image is a tad softer, but not something that you’d notice unless you were pixel-peeping.

Standard f/4
Standard f/4
Kolari f/4
Kolari f/4

The Kolari image is still a bit softer.

Standard f/5.6
Standard f/5.6
Kolari f/5.6
Kolari f/5.6

Still softer for the modified camera.

Standard f/8
Standard f/8
Kolari f/8
Kolari f/8

Still the Kolari is softer.

Standard f/11
Standard f/11
Kolari f/11
Kolari f/11

Now they’re about the same.

Standard f/16
Standard f/16
Kolari f/16
Kolari f/16

The same.

Standard f/22
Standard f/22
Kolari f/22
Kolari f/22

I’d say the Kolari image is slightly better, but they’re both pretty soft because of diffraction.

 

 

The Last Word

← Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — 28mm Elmarit-M Kolari Vision thin-stack mod on a7II — Leica 24/3.8 Elmar-M →

Comments

  1. Frank says

    October 10, 2015 at 7:05 pm

    The indication is that lenses which are further (longer focal length) from the sensor will be less impacted by this change. Is this correct? I am specifically interested in the zony 55 and the zeiss batis 85. Would these be impacted by the Kolari modification?

    Thanks for the great work,
    Frank

    Reply
    • Jim says

      October 10, 2015 at 8:09 pm

      The indication is that lenses which are further (longer focal length) from the sensor will be less impacted by this change. Is this correct?

      Yes.

      I am specifically interested in the zony 55 and the zeiss batis 85. Would these be impacted by the Kolari modification?

      I seriously doubt it.

      Jim

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.