• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / Still more infrared panos

Still more infrared panos

February 7, 2015 JimK 2 Comments

Here are some panos I’ve done with the IR-modified a7 and the 28mm f/1.4 Nikkor-D. I’m getting a little looser with my framing.

[Group 13]-_DSC9518__DSC9539-22 images_0000-Edit

[Group 2]-_DSC8655__DSC8661-7 images_0000-Edit

[Group 13]-_DSC8971__DSC8986-16 images_0000-Edit

[Group 5]-_DSC8895__DSC8902-8 images_0000-Edit

I ‘ve been playing with combining handheld HDR with stitching. AutoPano Giga will do the exposure blending and the stitching at the same time. It works well if there’s no wind. The picture below is what AutoPano did when presented with 13 three-exposure sets:

[Group 9]-_DSC9424__DSC9462-39 images_0000-Edit

[Group 10]-_DSC9468__DSC9484-17 images_0000-Edit

[Group 0]-_DSC9614__DSC9633-20 images_0000-Edit

 

I also experimented yesterday morning with the Zeiss 15mm f/2.8 ZF.2. It’s quite a lens, and does well with IR.

[Group 3]-_DSC9658__DSC9663-6 images_0000-Edit

 

The Last Word

← RRS L-bracket for a7II is shipping Nikon 12-bit raw mode →

Comments

  1. John says

    July 23, 2019 at 12:34 pm

    Hi Jim,

    I wasn’t sure of the best page to ask, as the question falls into a large Venn intersection of topics.

    I am in the process of choosing a main lens for stitched infrared images for a Fuji X-T2 which is being converted for 850nm.

    Assuming the candidate pool is free from hot spots, what are the key attributes for success?

    I was thinking that the narrow bandwidth would mean that it wouldn’t require broadband apochromaticism.

    I have been focusing on corner sharpness, but wondered if there were other important selection criteria?

    Also, what sort of total angles of vertical and horizontal fields of view are the median stitched oak images?

    Thanks so much.

    Reply
    • JimK says

      July 23, 2019 at 12:55 pm

      I was thinking that the narrow bandwidth would mean that it wouldn’t require broadband apochromaticism

      Correct.

      I think the main issue is finding a lens with no hot spots.

      Also, what sort of total angles of vertical and horizontal fields of view are the median stitched oak images?

      That’s an interesting question. I would guess around 90 degrees vertical and 120 horizontal, but that’s just a guess. I do remember at least one that seemed like it was nearly 180 degrees in both directions.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.