• site home
  • blog home
  • galleries
  • contact
  • underwater
  • the bleeding edge

the last word

Photography meets digital computer technology. Photography wins -- most of the time.

You are here: Home / The Last Word / More slit scan experiments — blending space and time

More slit scan experiments — blending space and time

November 15, 2016 JimK 7 Comments

This is the beginning of a series of post on synthetic slit scan photography (defined below). To see the other posts in this series, scroll down to the bottom of the page and click on the permalinks (below the comments) to navigate to each.

As long-time readers know, I have been a diligent searcher (and, occasionally, a finder) of ways to introduce the dimension of time into my photographs. One way that I’ve done that is with slit scan photographs. 

For those of you new to slit scans, the idea is that the vertical or horizontal dimension of the image is distance, like a normal photograph, but the other dimension is time, quite unlike a normal photograph, but like the images from finish-line cameras at racetracks. At first, I made slit scan photographs with a slit scan camera, the Betterlight Super 6K. Then I started to simulate a slit scan camera by writing computer programs to simulate the results from a real slit scan camera from a video file. 

In the last few days, I’ve embarked on another synthetic slit scan journey. This time, I am making the direction in the photograph that’s not strictly space a blend of space and time. I’m doing this  by writing programs to process groups of still images from a Sony a7RII. 

Confused? I don’t blame you. The easiest way to see what I’m doing is with a picture:

landscape-1-px-all-day

This image was constructed from 7500 conventional images, using a one-pixel wide column from each image. The time span is from before sunrise until after sunset the day before yesterday. The earliest capture is the leftmost column in the picture above, and the latest is the rightmost. The ISO setting and exposure were constant for all the exposures. 

Not going to inspire anyone, is it? I admit that, but I’m hoping that it’s the beginning of something.

Here’s another one of these, with the captures done over a three hour period, and five pixel wide columns from each exposure assembled into the final product:

lansscape-horo-5-px-slices-web

Everything looks pretty normal, except the clouds. If you analyze what’s going on with them, you’ll figure out that the winds aloft were away from me. The above image was made before I figured out that you have to turn off autoexposure to make this work well.

I have lots more work to do here. Eventually, I’d like to made the distance and time relationships of the axis perpendixular to the synthetic slit completely arbitrary. That’s going to take a lot of programming.

One of the difficulties with what I’m doing here is the size and number of the files, which translates into long processing times. With 42 MP files and a one-pixel-wide slit, it actually takes longer to process a series of captures that it does to make the exposures in the first place. I will probably be doing my initial work with much smaller files.

 

The Last Word

← A book report — lessons learned More slit scan experiments — processing speed →

Comments

  1. Jack Hogan says

    November 15, 2016 at 9:04 am

    Cool Jim, a slit scan time lapse.

    Reply
  2. Max Berlin says

    November 16, 2016 at 12:41 pm

    Leaving the shore takes imagination first then courage. You have both Jim. I’m interested to see where this lands.

    Reply
  3. Lynn Allan says

    November 18, 2016 at 8:14 am

    I’m curious if you have pre-visualized what this will look like for target scenes. “Staccato’ish” looking urban locations? Storms?

    I’m experiencing a “poverty of imagination” on how these will turn out, but I’m looking forward to what you come up with.

    Reply
    • Jim says

      November 18, 2016 at 8:52 am

      For urban locations with people and cars, you have to make the captures faster than the a7RII can record single images to its flash card. Video is the way to go here, I think. I haven’t experimented with video except with static slits.

      http://blog.kasson.com/?p=10586

      For people in cities, I’m thinking you need capture rates of at least 120 fps for 4K, and maybe as high as 1000 fps. Cameras that can do that are pretty dear, although I could experiment at lower resolutions.

      I’m playing with clouds this morning.

      Part of the fascination of this kind of thing for me is that I don’t really know what I’m going to get.

      Jim

      Reply

Trackbacks

  1. More slit scan experimants — parallel processing says:
    December 3, 2016 at 4:01 pm

    […] This post is part of a series about some experiments I’m doing combining space and time in slit scan photographs. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  2. More slit scan experiments — varied weather says:
    December 10, 2016 at 1:20 pm

    […] This post is part of a series about some experiments I’m doing combining space and time in slit scan photographs. The series starts here. […]

    Reply
  3. Flash card reliability says:
    January 15, 2017 at 9:08 pm

    […] been doing the synthetic slit scan images for a couple of months now. That series requires me to make many exposures. A typical run is 30,000 […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

May 2025
S M T W T F S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Apr    

Articles

  • About
    • Patents and papers about color
    • Who am I?
  • How to…
    • Backing up photographic images
    • How to change email providers
    • How to shoot slanted edge images for me
  • Lens screening testing
    • Equipment and Software
    • Examples
      • Bad and OK 200-600 at 600
      • Excellent 180-400 zoom
      • Fair 14-30mm zoom
      • Good 100-200 mm MF zoom
      • Good 100-400 zoom
      • Good 100mm lens on P1 P45+
      • Good 120mm MF lens
      • Good 18mm FF lens
      • Good 24-105 mm FF lens
      • Good 24-70 FF zoom
      • Good 35 mm FF lens
      • Good 35-70 MF lens
      • Good 60 mm lens on IQ3-100
      • Good 63 mm MF lens
      • Good 65 mm FF lens
      • Good 85 mm FF lens
      • Good and bad 25mm FF lenses
      • Good zoom at 24 mm
      • Marginal 18mm lens
      • Marginal 35mm FF lens
      • Mildly problematic 55 mm FF lens
      • OK 16-35mm zoom
      • OK 60mm lens on P1 P45+
      • OK Sony 600mm f/4
      • Pretty good 16-35 FF zoom
      • Pretty good 90mm FF lens
      • Problematic 400 mm FF lens
      • Tilted 20 mm f/1.8 FF lens
      • Tilted 30 mm MF lens
      • Tilted 50 mm FF lens
      • Two 15mm FF lenses
    • Found a problem – now what?
    • Goals for this test
    • Minimum target distances
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Printable Siemens Star targets
    • Target size on sensor
      • MFT
      • APS-C
      • Full frame
      • Small medium format
    • Test instructions — postproduction
    • Test instructions — reading the images
    • Test instructions – capture
    • Theory of the test
    • What’s wrong with conventional lens screening?
  • Previsualization heresy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Recommended photographic web sites
  • Using in-camera histograms for ETTR
    • Acknowledgments
    • Why ETTR?
    • Normal in-camera histograms
    • Image processing for in-camera histograms
    • Making the in-camera histogram closely represent the raw histogram
    • Shortcuts to UniWB
    • Preparing for monitor-based UniWB
    • A one-step UniWB procedure
    • The math behind the one-step method
    • Iteration using Newton’s Method

Category List

Recent Comments

  • JimK on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • DC Wedding Photographer on Goldilocks and the three flashes
  • Wedding Photographer in DC on The 16-Bit Fallacy: Why More Isn’t Always Better in Medium Format Cameras
  • JimK on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • Renjie Zhu on Fujifilm GFX 100S II precision
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • JimK on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF
  • Ivo de Man on Fuji 20-35/4 landscape field curvature at 23mm vs 23/4 GF

Archives

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

Unless otherwise noted, all images copyright Jim Kasson.